IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Last Call: <draft-kucherawy-dkim-atps-11.txt> (DKIM Authorized Third-Party Signers) to Experimental RFC

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Tue, 06 December 2011 01:48 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A0F121F8770 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 17:48:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.655
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.655 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.056, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pBKvIt8IRAuT for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 17:48:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com (ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com [72.5.239.25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D94B21F8726 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 17:48:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from spite.corp.cloudmark.com (172.22.10.72) by EXCH-HTCAS901.corp.cloudmark.com (172.22.10.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.355.2; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 17:48:37 -0800
Received: from EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.1.74]) by spite.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.10.72]) with mapi; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 17:48:37 -0800
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 17:48:35 -0800
Subject: RE: Last Call: <draft-kucherawy-dkim-atps-11.txt> (DKIM Authorized Third-Party Signers) to Experimental RFC
Thread-Topic: Last Call: <draft-kucherawy-dkim-atps-11.txt> (DKIM Authorized Third-Party Signers) to Experimental RFC
Thread-Index: AcyztdkyXizqKJyhT3WjvcSnmeJpIAAAziEw
Message-ID: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C15408@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <20111204212736.64731.qmail@joyce.lan> <4EDD59AB.9030305@dcrocker.net> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1112051717090.2317@joyce.lan>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1112051717090.2317@joyce.lan>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 01:48:38 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of John R. Levine
> Sent: Monday, December 05, 2011 5:25 PM
> To: Dave Crocker
> Cc: ietf@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-kucherawy-dkim-atps-11.txt> (DKIM Authorized Third-Party Signers) to Experimental RFC
> 
> If you're referring to the second paragraph in section 5, I agree that
> the second sentence should go, or at least be rewritten to clarify that
> the client is supposed to pretend that the message passed ADSP.  If
> it's anything else in atps-11, you'll have to help me out with
> references to specific language.

But that's what Section 6 says.

Section 5 is for those people that do DKIM without ADSP but care about giving author domain signatures preferential treatment.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email