IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-kucherawy-dkim-atps-11.txt> (DKIM Authorized Third-Party Signers) to Experimental RFC

"John Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> Tue, 06 December 2011 05:05 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A5A91F0C9C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 21:05:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.808
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.808 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.391, BAYES_00=-2.599, HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI=-4.3, RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED=-4.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rmgw09HJpmuR for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 21:05:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4328C1F0C43 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 21:05:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 41608 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2011 05:05:26 -0000
Received: from gal.iecc.com (64.57.183.53) by mail2.iecc.com with SMTP; 6 Dec 2011 05:05:26 -0000
Received: (qmail 192 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2011 05:05:26 -0000
Received: from leila.iecc.com (64.57.183.34) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 6 Dec 2011 05:05:26 -0000
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 05:05:04 -0000
Message-ID: <20111206050504.2226.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@iecc.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-kucherawy-dkim-atps-11.txt> (DKIM Authorized Third-Party Signers) to Experimental RFC
In-Reply-To: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C15408@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 05:05:31 -0000

>Section 5 is for those people that do DKIM without ADSP but care about
>giving author domain signatures preferential treatment.

Since there's nothing in the DKIM spec that suggests that's a correct
way to use DKIM, I'd be fairly unhappy about any language that
purports to legitimize it.

Here in standards-land, if you think that author domain signatures
matter, you're supposed to use ADSP.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email