RE: Last Call: <draft-kucherawy-dkim-atps-11.txt> (DKIM Authorized Third-Party Signers) to Experimental RFC

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Thu, 08 December 2011 19:12 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B97D21F86D0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Dec 2011 11:12:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.591
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.591 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.008, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s3wxQVy6HydJ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Dec 2011 11:11:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com (ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com [72.5.239.25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C66A21F85DB for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Dec 2011 11:11:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from malice.corp.cloudmark.com (172.22.10.71) by EXCH-HTCAS901.corp.cloudmark.com (172.22.10.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.355.2; Thu, 8 Dec 2011 11:11:59 -0800
Received: from EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.1.74]) by malice.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.10.71]) with mapi; Thu, 8 Dec 2011 11:11:59 -0800
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: Douglas Otis <dotis@mail-abuse.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 11:11:58 -0800
Subject: RE: Last Call: <draft-kucherawy-dkim-atps-11.txt> (DKIM Authorized Third-Party Signers) to Experimental RFC
Thread-Topic: Last Call: <draft-kucherawy-dkim-atps-11.txt> (DKIM Authorized Third-Party Signers) to Experimental RFC
Thread-Index: Acy11ObKzI3ABK1oTLi60+NX/mcCOwACE2XA
Message-ID: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C154BC@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <20111130193811.27694.3836.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20111130114403.09e15118@resistor.net> <4ED96652.8000902@dcrocker.net> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C153C8@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com> <4EDA6C6A.7010605@dcrocker.net> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C153D1@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com> <4EE0FDE6.3060401@mail-abuse.org>
In-Reply-To: <4EE0FDE6.3060401@mail-abuse.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 19:12:00 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Douglas Otis
> Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 10:12 AM
> To: ietf@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-kucherawy-dkim-atps-11.txt> (DKIM Authorized Third-Party Signers) to Experimental RFC
> 
> I support adoption of dkim-atps as an experimental RFC.  It would have
> been clearer to use the term Author-Domain rather than Author.
> Clearly, it is not the Author offering Authorization.

This has already been fixed in the working copy, which I'll post after the IETF LC closes.

-MSK