Generalist ADs?

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 26 March 2015 16:24 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 996371A87D9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 09:24:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gMMTneZ5ldT6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 09:24:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-x234.google.com (mail-lb0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FA991A8799 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 09:24:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lbcgn8 with SMTP id gn8so44762115lbc.2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 09:24:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=2UFHKx7YbR9URFUgCNFVt9dSvaewAh0J857NJNoKCmg=; b=NoSwBdM62xru2nl4v7NmNf4hs7jm8mk7+wFkUCGSgbc8/F9RoJl8FWpwTOzloLvNT4 ZRDcmTcCx1jeqL5ltX8FHkFoamjckyd6jR+i/oRiFK3B8Fk1BiDSHSlH5oIEgGFdHwMH Q54nvzli13UoS0qNIRQOuVgXphcMy21ceLKvqUrE8sIZ9ix1y+NpQkiyjei9aQ2r/P8N oLaAj9jkPGRCSjmhDB7fXQBPMH5Ll5Yhz3ikIqA6v5Z5ns5UWsviEoxBn3d0oTOPlAT9 rzQfv4TeArbLRRXKvZsjO0eyGfnJAKwN9eohUmY2QvMp6fFMfXffeFFOyAmKrgQvzDUn 7ARw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.93.167 with SMTP id cv7mr14272780lbb.77.1427387066736; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 09:24:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.152.129.193 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 09:24:26 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 11:24:26 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-d3B3b4w1tOW_jhF1=5dT3D17DWn=yn_yzbc1xE2K7oSg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Generalist ADs?
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
To: David Black <david.black@emc.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1134976611e6b3051233730a"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/1HhfrxnQb57o1aqCl_LymHsQ0TE>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 16:24:29 -0000

Hi, David,

You mentioned intentionally including one or more ADs who were generalists
on the IESG, during Admin Plenary open mike time last night.

I think I understood what you mean by that, because I responded to your
comment and you didn't say "no, silly rabbit, what I'm saying is ..."

But could you give us a sentence or two about what you're thinking?

(I think I agree, but I'd like to make sure I'm agreeing with what you're
thinking!)

Thanks,

Spencer