IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Consultation on DRAFT Infrastructure and Services Vulnerability Disclosure Statement

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Wed, 05 August 2020 21:48 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 136CA3A0406; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 14:48:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SGMwVoBHTpcY; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 14:48:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (ns.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22A283A0141; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 14:48:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [198.252.137.10] (helo=PSB) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1k3RGf-000Iot-NW; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 17:48:13 -0400
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2020 17:48:07 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org>
cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Consultation on DRAFT Infrastructure and Services Vulnerability Disclosure Statement
Message-ID: <9EBFC2F78B74E850149274BD@PSB>
In-Reply-To: <A1DCE7DE-78A8-434C-8ADA-5979E3F53181@vigilsec.com>
References: <159651200228.24262.1827308624474280314@ietfa.amsl.com> <m2k0yeca1a.wl-randy@psg.com> <793241C9-C75C-407D-AD98-06E13C789154@ietf.org> <A1DCE7DE-78A8-434C-8ADA-5979E3F53181@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 198.252.137.10
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/1OiTOutA-jzflOhVM8wt85qrb54>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2020 21:48:40 -0000

+1
And noting that using github in the way it is being used for
this document tends to turn an opportunity for community
discussion of issues into a model in which people offer you
(Jay) advice and you resolve those comments, apparently as you
deem appropriate.  Perhaps that is appropriate for LLC actions
but it is not how the IETF, in my experience at least, normally
does business and is very far from the "decisions are made on
mailing lists" model.  

    john




--On Wednesday, August 5, 2020 16:31 -0400 Russ Housley
<housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:

> Jay:
> 
>>> the llc's proposal should be an internet-draft, please.
> 
> You can do all the editing and issue tracking in GitHub.
> However, I agree with Randy this should be posted as an
> Internet-Draft to facilitate archive and discussion.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email