IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Split the IANA functions?

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Tue, 07 January 2014 14:58 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4128F1AD935 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 06:58:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.039
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.039 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qh4ZgEriqiWp for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 06:58:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20D301AD8CD for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 06:58:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=275; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1389106713; x=1390316313; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fSwed78OeDVPuIBzMmI5zWIVMEt5TQ+lWvW9RiJJFnw=; b=E2aQV9kuyzym823ICFifLsT8XAofqsX2VsHLRYf1fEpHWl2JjD/bTfsc zq0yRgEs8AQvFbT/bhZqeKZAzFvuHIpVAJ4agqbPR7GDbDfleFBONa9LN BuehDbr/WilfAphZCw2OJ8h1i0lKTVq/7RpkdziccAona2nhg01odqQx9 k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhUFAE4VzFKQ/khL/2dsb2JhbABZgwuEC4lArSWBEBZ0giYBAQQjVRELDgwCBRYLAgIJAwIBAgErGgYBDAgBAYgAqhSaJheBKY1igm+BSAEDmBeSFYMuOw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,619,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="3293588"
Received: from ams-core-2.cisco.com ([144.254.72.75]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Jan 2014 14:58:32 +0000
Received: from mctiny.local ([10.61.211.253]) by ams-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s07EwWnf032155 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 7 Jan 2014 14:58:32 GMT
Message-ID: <52CC1618.1090605@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 15:58:32 +0100
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Split the IANA functions?
References: <CAMm+LwinAb6+7BoMzwBWyu63vofndxK9VY6DSNN0Ykza4SxuMQ@mail.gmail.com> <52CB0010.5010407@gmail.com> <CAMm+LwhN8+z9q4KQXVY9bWA6TAqxx1=Qg0OUfK=VGCSDg5uWEA@mail.gmail.com> <DD618936-0D13-41F1-8D89-2E3171D864B5@istaff.org> <52CB31F4.3090703@cs.tcd.ie> <52CB987A.20300@cisco.com> <20140107144412.GB11068@mx1.yitter.info>
In-Reply-To: <20140107144412.GB11068@mx1.yitter.info>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 14:58:43 -0000

Andrew,

It's clear that I wasn't clear.  Deciding on a tree structure has
political implications, be that DNS, RPKI, or other (and there are
other).  To ignore those implications would be unwise.  They are weighed
against technical considerations, as always.

Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email