Re: Split the IANA functions?

Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Tue, 07 January 2014 09:51 UTC

Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1F311ADF22 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 01:51:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gvxNDSLOG2eY for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 01:51:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pd0-x235.google.com (mail-pd0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 917821AD8EC for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 01:51:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pd0-f181.google.com with SMTP id p10so160012pdj.12 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 01:51:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=4fwScPAHEjNuZikaXZ8I5ioPS/uS0fWqEaS4jGCQfcU=; b=E8UpTFHWI8cy49Q3ZvW/FkWScd8ZxptPa1Jqh1EKDU/1pVlx1Gjg0tZ3pzkfWPIgLu nb+RmwReDU/ImMXbGeVNhMtVZ1quDuJRUgqnUaKdZaHxJabBMm8NCcpjWl5VLbQlkbHT LXeC9jzc15fXO6wTAObegYGtGBYAUXyFSndUSiqGFM9qzmuUiHU3fk+D/utewZqAmChH 3wy4UpzaKgttOkAzbRUwIxq22caVpjkr2KwDW/303Te8QfX8nfwGF+WMI++ri5MtKBTz GvFkjNQe7ClU9t/nY9nfLxuCvxD9nYJAXzMOHuF11ihTI5Cl9qKsvi14Ux2oLVP9FD0j njTA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.66.154.75 with SMTP id vm11mr4169325pab.124.1389088301726; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 01:51:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.0.104 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 01:51:41 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <52CB9CCF.3070001@dcrocker.net>
References: <CAMm+LwinAb6+7BoMzwBWyu63vofndxK9VY6DSNN0Ykza4SxuMQ@mail.gmail.com> <52CB0010.5010407@gmail.com> <CAMm+LwhN8+z9q4KQXVY9bWA6TAqxx1=Qg0OUfK=VGCSDg5uWEA@mail.gmail.com> <DD618936-0D13-41F1-8D89-2E3171D864B5@istaff.org> <52CB31F4.3090703@cs.tcd.ie> <52CB987A.20300@cisco.com> <52CB9CCF.3070001@dcrocker.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 10:51:41 +0100
Message-ID: <CADnDZ8-GcBOAszCFHzD_iJN3Jgw1NbQ_731_v3xkT=zNAVz57g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Split the IANA functions?
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 09:51:51 -0000

On 1/7/14, Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:

> We choose to listen to our
> "customers" -- that is, those who buy and use what we produce -- rather
> than third-party actors who might favor ensuring that pervasive
> monitoring be made easy.

Who are the IETF customers? can be: a majority of diverse individual
users of the Internet, a minority of large organisations, and a
majority of small/medium organisations (all have different purposes,
not ignoring possible attackers).

>
> That choice can be classed as political, but really, we're just
> listening to our market...

What is/are the IETF market(s), or should IETF be getting fees from its markets?
Each world region has its own answers.

Political decisions is not the problem, it happens as output of any
organisation, the problem is that IETF is not diversified enough !!!

AB