IETF Logo Mail Archive

(no subject)

DonNiall@aol.com Sun, 18 March 2001 22:00 UTC

Received: by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) id RAA11007 for ietf-outbound.10@ietf.org; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 17:00:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: from imo-m04.mx.aol.com (imo-m04.mx.aol.com [64.12.136.7]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id QAA10950 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 16:56:25 -0500 (EST)
From: DonNiall@aol.com
Received: from DonNiall@aol.com by imo-m04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v29.5.) id l.df.11e2cb2f (4155) for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 16:55:53 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <df.11e2cb2f.27e688e9@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 16:55:53 -0500
Subject: (no subject)
To: ietf@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_df.11e2cb2f.27e688e9_boundary"
Content-Disposition: Inline
X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows UK sub 58
X-Loop: ietf@ietf.org

I know this question is not of direct relevance to this forum - but I believe 
folks may be able to offer some input.

Is there any known procedure (general heuristics?) whereby, given the clock 
speed associated with a specific CISC based x86 processor, the associated 
MIPS rating can be calculated - with a broad level of accuracy?

 - Don

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email