IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Enum] (no subject)

"Jim Fleming" <jimfleming@prodigy.net> Thu, 25 October 2001 16:50 UTC

Received: by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) id MAA23669 for ietf-outbound.10@ietf.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 12:50:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) id MAA23583 for ietf-mainout; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 12:47:40 -0400 (EDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: ietf.org: majordom set sender to owner-ietf@ietf.org using -f
Received: from pimout2-int.prodigy.net (pimout2-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.63.101]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA23561 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 12:47:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from pc (dialup-166.90.66.18.Dial1.Chicago1.Level3.net [166.90.66.18]) by pimout2-int.prodigy.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id f9PGlSP239112; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 12:47:28 -0400
Message-ID: <000901c15d76$23b3e200$12425aa6@pc>
From: Jim Fleming <jimfleming@prodigy.net>
To: Daniel Massey <masseyd@isi.edu>, dhc@dcrocker.net, trutkowski@versign.com
Cc: "ietf@ietf. org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "krose@ntia. doc. gov" <krose@ntia.doc.gov>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20011024173342.03615db0@127.0.0.1> <bd.15f27e59.2908858f@aol.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20011024173338.03f8bc90@dcrocker.net> <003101c15d56$b1d9dbe0$0d843841@pc> <3BD83A6D.6F9D8E64@isi.edu>
Subject: Re: [Enum] (no subject)
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 11:57:30 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ietf@ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Loop: ietf@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Thank you for your response. U.S. Federal laws require that
such discussions be held in open forums. As a individual from
the .EDU community, I am not sure what your interest would
be, but everyone is welcome to their opinion.

Jim Fleming
http://www.DOT-BIZ.com
http://www.in-addr.info
3:219 INFO


----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel Massey" <masseyd@isi.edu>
To: "Jim Fleming" <jimfleming@prodigy.net>; <dhc@dcrocker.net>;
<trutkowski@versign.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 11:14 AM
Subject: Re: [Enum] (no subject)


> | ietf@ietf.org dropped from this thread
>
> You posted to the ietf list so I assume you want some feedback from
> the thousands of people like me who read the list.
>
> First, you are asking for the disclosure of "widely reported"
> information.  Think about the logic of that for minute.
> I'm not sure what you mean by disclose, but my dictionary says:
>   disclose: To make known something heretofore kept secret.
>
> Second, why should I care about Tony and Dave's employment
> history?  It is true that IETF topics have commercial implications,
> but the technical merit of an idea is not related to how it impacts
> the foo.com business plan.  Stick to the technical content and
> discuss corporate agendas elsewhere.  I don't see any technical
> point here that warrants the attention of the entire IETF.
>
> Dan
>
> Jim Fleming wrote:
> >
> > Dave,
> >
> > Do you think it is ethical for people to not disclose who is paying them
> > and what their real agenda is ?
> >
> > It is widely reported that you are paid by Neustar, Neulevel, ICANN,
> > and/or MCI/Worldcom (i.e. Vinton Cerf).
> >
> > Will you be disclosing who has paid you all these years to participate
> > in discussions as if you are a neutral party ?
> >

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email