IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IPv10 I-D Destiny.

Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org> Wed, 12 August 2020 19:31 UTC

Return-Path: <krose@krose.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4851E3A082F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:31:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=krose.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7dkpF8rY0VJ9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:31:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua1-x930.google.com (mail-ua1-x930.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::930]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E13BE3A0838 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:31:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua1-x930.google.com with SMTP id g20so947697uan.7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:31:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=krose.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=6k2+PT5ZOPx5Xc4f/S3XFHIjYAy6AAJRWuei/WQfDrg=; b=e7wkShNbFGVduJBOcnWwKyU69QJ7qPXOyGboIC7ij5l2XqH7vqlDzY0WqzSw3axYrz 76tt1Oj+Vmbts+fv8C60u/+/2JqDjcstX65DMuK/3xn6/yim40vjkbD2k32rxAZo3by/ VsViofAgvC/do/l2anAfV6ktD9yDgHQ3KTQHI=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6k2+PT5ZOPx5Xc4f/S3XFHIjYAy6AAJRWuei/WQfDrg=; b=Bkrq0ro+poPgcQUNc+CqpdYnsfrEFjq+k2iOvEMAS18t2G8RnXaBMzUdDZZlwdLFkF fTeXOFqXeQxLd381sJpgKkiCv9TQmbl+gcRKrV2OVi/g2N61OHXRNbYnf2EAGKMrsg9p C+nsIidn8NOkCL7MRR6ppjjv2uLSNZY4HASVEnxjrQtB8MF4Nfdmp+gtzHAzyrwsBSdV e6pWXT+Mx6koxZt0HUnptWOIJNnocdlAbwoyTg92b8KsFbNwxWQzyuAPsFw+E6XWtbjj mg9/HHtNdHex8Jyl8/vvbhXBodmt6XJZbyv3rXLGOOLRXaUv9mLzyWuScmz22zmyrBzE Fd7Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531MqB1NnSzo/CAq4N9x32ZBnwRP+iTx9xiGKvqqUU2e9r9ZGWwl lft81UdnYSdl025ltMglToAqeBI0hS+Oc/JjuaGGew==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw4gvOanYEOdQwZ10fPBJFrjXyaduVmoViu8OQXdoXws6cBroIWg/JgVady9bA3uDyflgVSx0a4GYbKvEQUaUs=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:567:: with SMTP id 94mr789423uax.26.1597260673648; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:31:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <AM7P194MB0723D773FCD8BAE7D9C6C9A8AE420@AM7P194MB0723.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <AM7P194MB0723BD2C01221F94050AE995AE420@AM7P194MB0723.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CAOj+MMG9vKaExnRzyA5zxkSfXYE1NA+vHFNSKD9GKaRpjfhrkg@mail.gmail.com> <AM7P194MB07238ECACD2424550BF422CEAE420@AM7P194MB0723.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <AM7P194MB07238ECACD2424550BF422CEAE420@AM7P194MB0723.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
From: Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 15:31:02 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJU8_nWOFpUNxPZQnzf0PWSU=AcouLVKCLiEtwEyqNWnXidjkw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IPv10 I-D Destiny.
To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
Cc: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000112d7205acb33b9b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/2JCX0ODsmGj5KnsNWINBlx3JqFs>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 19:31:16 -0000

On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 2:48 PM Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
wrote:

> Maybe there is confusion at the ietf, KRP is different than IPv10 I-D.
>

It seems clear there is no interest from IETF participants in pursuing this
work. Consider:

* More than 20 years have passed since IPv6 was published as a proposed
standard.
* IPv6 is in widespread use: for example, roughly 30% of Google's traffic
comes from IPv6 clients.
* There are already numerous v4/v6 transition and interoperability
technologies, and seemingly little appetite for developing any more.

Bringing potential work to the IETF carries the burden of convincing others
to work with you on it. You have not done this, and frankly you are
unlikely to do so as the internet engineering community has decided en
masse that the v4/v6 interoperability problem space has been sufficiently
covered by existing technologies and has moved on to other things.

Kyle

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email