IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: IPv10 I-D Destiny.

Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com> Wed, 12 August 2020 04:27 UTC

Return-Path: <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A48B3A0F8E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 21:27:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=outlook.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jkhql6P8H32v for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 21:27:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR04-DB3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092074038.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.74.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90CC23A0F8D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 21:27:34 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=LN9VIVSTPeJktQfUXPELjijiPmOzReK0VHBN612GogW6o3DqgQIjx7oys7RUE7O7Ky4PiYoVJtkdJ885TIanuVz/oXRYFS02xUVH69mGZu6uTCI35c9hKrsg6E7OWxZjyxr4GV067SbqnEvbU6pg2GfnhshRN2RE7VA43JPckoWlZzThm/6uMnSToSuZJVlru/N/xiZDnj7/moUOWq0UMjXBxiLwT0g0Vhu0lRIsJSefMhkD0DXwRXp77sopZgkX9G62bl8CJPUSHY/8h651P3Rii8khtN80LPIy/+EKgVaUwM71iYUIqvAErL7SIG3VLZCHoXS7YmGtazIj9SiJKw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=9c0Ug6awKGj/6oo15rZwhA3VVB8M4+3+Bo5SanWaFGE=; b=nbbFvCnKQnuokCQn84wd7+w1c5rbX4E1MntEc8utGcY7FsU/7YnrrtIlTYFXKjt2eU6OMenywvRq0wwtlUmYOYPmigzbm4oabjQrriQegJpT0/GWhnWblEOdWL45lSmJlXnIO9dVwXhoOZd5AAyJyqLMReql6hglxQrDI07B2ECGumU7lwtuhQXVEpMFNioilYV0rO1h+btqYygyLtMvNgumUYC4HSWJ6LHt33oCCLhnifrZCO61rCphlCcmlOnuGCM2LlhDSE/xdcJg3RSMwfz62prP9KI/WCAF+G1YVwbsvUaMLEgDEv+LV7db9zCZIHewOBbFoikEyunxSbLRBw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=9c0Ug6awKGj/6oo15rZwhA3VVB8M4+3+Bo5SanWaFGE=; b=UF+Qxmt/T2zIYkOXkkI7mPTyCJiOr5UAP9NDOtSqMP5agnUkKM2oyvBag9QVUwIXawNf5uaB1n4Naa53IQfocUs8IJ6XPV3n4dkUK+tUxoILqAYSn/NwXInnbre9L6Ej0MwB6/ocpFecsAg+ESk2siuwYWRJMHzzuafvGAY2Rk6AsVbt+616zQUNOPnch/PvUf3D/6mFvO6rDvQ+99oe0H7vEngRpWKmPPp+uUYEJhHiIHUCqcPKOiB5maIV9HqHfuTk3gpFpFNgJ9N4k+LuWrFHNvi7hUXL3I+BS1KfzJooTZps2WqygaVnX36Jm3NljSChTu3vUlF1rU6xpcvhew==
Received: from DB3EUR04FT054.eop-eur04.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e0c::42) by DB3EUR04HT219.eop-eur04.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e0c::391) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3283.16; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 04:27:31 +0000
Received: from AM7P194MB0723.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2a01:111:e400:7e0c::47) by DB3EUR04FT054.mail.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e0c::100) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3261.16 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 04:27:31 +0000
Received: from AM7P194MB0723.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::f8b9:eda6:885a:8b70]) by AM7P194MB0723.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::f8b9:eda6:885a:8b70%9]) with mapi id 15.20.3283.015; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 04:27:31 +0000
From: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
To: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: IPv10 I-D Destiny.
Thread-Topic: IPv10 I-D Destiny.
Thread-Index: AdZwSadmkCW8yAGVQuetrcQGh13YMwAFeBpg
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 04:27:31 +0000
Message-ID: <AM7P194MB0723BD2C01221F94050AE995AE420@AM7P194MB0723.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <AM7P194MB0723D773FCD8BAE7D9C6C9A8AE420@AM7P194MB0723.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <AM7P194MB0723D773FCD8BAE7D9C6C9A8AE420@AM7P194MB0723.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:F4DFB6422BC97DC7862B888C0B96FEF6E2C3DB435B4F13210AA94B847C735349; UpperCasedChecksum:79EEBA69084B95CDA2ABD89439B121690037A3D1FDC904880DDAD1796FE4BD25; SizeAsReceived:6792; Count:43
x-tmn: [iCALjTPpMkldKGaYfV2WF3lNleBhW5oU]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-incomingheadercount: 43
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: b48c4434-062f-4ab7-519c-08d83e7807ab
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DB3EUR04HT219:
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:0; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:AM7P194MB0723.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:; DIR:OUT; SFP:1901;
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_AM7P194MB0723BD2C01221F94050AE995AE420AM7P194MB0723EURP_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: DB3EUR04FT054.eop-eur04.prod.protection.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: b48c4434-062f-4ab7-519c-08d83e7807ab
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-rms-persistedconsumerorg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 12 Aug 2020 04:27:31.5922 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB3EUR04HT219
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/2SnxX-AuXarje6bWpbxcTogmVY0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 04:27:37 -0000

It's really weird to hear the silence for my e-mails at the IETf main list, at the same time, to see insistence with consensus not take any decision or any official announcement to the internet community regarding the division problem, people are in need to get feedback for this issue as this problem affects all internet users, I can't keep making the problem clear more than that as it is obvious for all, time to act positively to get benefits for all.

I write here because I care about solving the problem and can't do more than proposing a solution, please let's put any hat or agenda aside and make an announcement regarding how the IETF is working on solving that problem and I'm sure they have full support from the community as they believe on you, otherwise, it will be a waste of time not to make any discussion regarding this issue to make people feel comfortable.

Khaled Omar

From: ietf <ietf-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Khaled Omar
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2020 3:48 AM
To: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: IPv10 I-D Destiny.

Hi All,

As all of you now see the great contributions to developing the Internet it is not from the logic point of view to keep watching the division occurs between internet hosts.

As I proposed an I-D earlier that offers a solution to this pandemic that started to be distributed in the internet due to IPv4 address space exhaustion and the no migration to IPv6 occurred till now.

So please take one moment and evaluate the IPv10 I-D and make an accurate decision whether it can be promoted to a Standard or there is another solution that could solve this problem from its roots.

Here is the linky to the IPv10 I-D:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-omar-ipv10-06

THANK YOU,

Khaled Omar

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email