IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: IPv10 I-D Destiny.

Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com> Wed, 12 August 2020 19:38 UTC

Return-Path: <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6AE03A0859 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:38:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=outlook.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cOe3PWNd8FWb for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:37:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR01-DB5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092064047.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.64.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17D933A080C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:37:58 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=BDE2y5gshci4X2b3Wf/ozb7KzXNLhIU61Oh4o2wBmsr6QpCiADP+8G3AzSeePmmT+rmFBx03j5LZcVckDZnGHecpDhIj3XLQe5aBVWtjdxYhrmS2/7EvXxq8SSymcfcKXFRSHrVsYVH/MouyEN6ZbOo+bgocjtDnx9BkZOsXFB2hkdK8tqnBpyr8TC0HjJLHLI5VKp3j/4m/qAuRnTFtNa7vAzZfgt/6CRPa38tF90F2/lYO5PLzSZ4DyGNX7EYdXycqnEvUWjZc8hWjHA2zNg2RPQlLYjV+4l+wo4xcZLBdsnQNCiXKIR+k16B+Yh/CdktAZ1l23IS2QKLHIW+a6Q==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=rfPdgUl1o+24HiHxPLfRVtx64OtXm2MyZOCODa/Iwrs=; b=Lzzl6UBIm1WDqn/SNkQP7+zrpYZ73XKpjhqN3Z8ehro8EhiRJnzbavxydG17MZvubmioD8yDNS0mquuJAUZU/xYBImd5Q7mk1fwE66B1GnYD5TUZZHttTnir2PoburSKxZRrzXLobosQfIWYX9ZmIoFXD0jy6j2G7Dlm3J9xKwIeIujup8HxvVWoiyGBZx1ueK1DJmsZ3ehxOIbp8ZQs1+E8g4RHpKXfE+s8rNEKnLkAybrIB2XxOPRfrbiBXWENqLjgdhlhxbhidtMmx9A8N5xmOJpnmMfQEM3EmMc3o0RQ5lSCsKmLOYGGZGKS9KoZRa280SfCzMF8eX1ipGyoBA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=rfPdgUl1o+24HiHxPLfRVtx64OtXm2MyZOCODa/Iwrs=; b=YtQ3kHP6mXdShpXmozik5zPkhKSAFK0sAAqRIFeiWyBkGeGYrcVQVZc050NQA5474wwWB/C29pdtN+n4f5V+6pn+y0D38i5x4WUav1fsHpShjTN1wmn7DnYGmfiZs5ij0xEgbvOqfRx/3irg0/N8vF+wv9+YjD0KeAI9FFrf8zTHnUUhYm47e0YEDbexJlu7jFzYdb/EHclzZe2EWqMBs+RaaoWdOSflvzYI/GH1+SmJlmw/PbvVKjyJu+w3ug2AzLjuqx8uGv6XuCHJwA3k3xiutl3kJniglSLcReeSxllqnmLo/vYfc6YDpi27a9GGo1K9iCQ4YnYkGaPHikT7ow==
Received: from VE1EUR01FT040.eop-EUR01.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e19::46) by VE1EUR01HT022.eop-EUR01.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e19::394) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3261.16; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 19:37:56 +0000
Received: from AM7P194MB0723.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2a01:111:e400:7e19::4b) by VE1EUR01FT040.mail.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e19::302) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3283.16 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 19:37:55 +0000
Received: from AM7P194MB0723.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::f8b9:eda6:885a:8b70]) by AM7P194MB0723.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::f8b9:eda6:885a:8b70%9]) with mapi id 15.20.3283.015; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 19:37:55 +0000
From: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
To: Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org>
CC: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: IPv10 I-D Destiny.
Thread-Topic: IPv10 I-D Destiny.
Thread-Index: AdZwSadmkCW8yAGVQuetrcQGh13YMwAFeBpgAB0JpAAAAUQGgAABl6AAAAAvunA=
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 19:37:55 +0000
Message-ID: <AM7P194MB07234000DA37EF7A9C45A546AE420@AM7P194MB0723.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <AM7P194MB0723D773FCD8BAE7D9C6C9A8AE420@AM7P194MB0723.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <AM7P194MB0723BD2C01221F94050AE995AE420@AM7P194MB0723.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CAOj+MMG9vKaExnRzyA5zxkSfXYE1NA+vHFNSKD9GKaRpjfhrkg@mail.gmail.com> <AM7P194MB07238ECACD2424550BF422CEAE420@AM7P194MB0723.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CAJU8_nWOFpUNxPZQnzf0PWSU=AcouLVKCLiEtwEyqNWnXidjkw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJU8_nWOFpUNxPZQnzf0PWSU=AcouLVKCLiEtwEyqNWnXidjkw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:9F757E80EF7439D07010BBA7DD589B53B2AD0E184477F59002C863F784B78C39; UpperCasedChecksum:382BFCA966E6A54B731D81FAA43DEF55D745B4EA58663A81D19463D8E935AA36; SizeAsReceived:7171; Count:44
x-tmn: [jRPqXiPHooWsvvb/odU0rwOAqX1JULpP]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-incomingheadercount: 44
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 0f033288-2cb7-463c-a102-08d83ef7362d
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: VE1EUR01HT022:
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: bO+TOBWNK07itSiqJT11izf5tgQ3SwZ//oEh2e55Se0PbQucyrmU2rB61XmUID+MQBv5X6wzgtE0r43nogd+lKofnHGl7DWtIOTxxeri0m5w1LGe5zuhqlE1eqqyGKTLVr3NbQCr7Q6by38vxW2ev+0xqFG9253NGSTps261SJOxfB+ByThV901X4w2h+WoMPgYFx7rzxn5uRAC4fwGipg==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:0; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:AM7P194MB0723.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:; DIR:OUT; SFP:1901;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: NyZ52PCjRk82REq4CINqA1lv9fwngy/ab30XiF+V259RcgiT33JcUC7tCZE9rEnuvBNM56NwORjTDcVvjjAnSqzJz4SyShlMjxr3Vgc6uJK0gaRWTjGATcpCFXShMVjPCiHjNjF/3JKhkO+ZW/i9Wg==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_AM7P194MB07234000DA37EF7A9C45A546AE420AM7P194MB0723EURP_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: VE1EUR01FT040.eop-EUR01.prod.protection.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 0f033288-2cb7-463c-a102-08d83ef7362d
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-rms-persistedconsumerorg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 12 Aug 2020 19:37:55.8574 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: VE1EUR01HT022
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/sEyRDoRYcCy0wiUgW-rzD5KiZi0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 19:38:03 -0000

>> You have not done this, and frankly you are unlikely to do so as the internet engineering community has decided en masse that the v4/v6 interoperability problem space has been sufficiently covered by existing technologies and has moved on to other things.

Are people well trained to apply these technologies?

KHALED OMAR

From: Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2020 9:31 PM
To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
Cc: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>; IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: IPv10 I-D Destiny.

On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 2:48 PM Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com<mailto:eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>> wrote:
Maybe there is confusion at the ietf, KRP is different than IPv10 I-D.

It seems clear there is no interest from IETF participants in pursuing this work. Consider:

* More than 20 years have passed since IPv6 was published as a proposed standard.
* IPv6 is in widespread use: for example, roughly 30% of Google's traffic comes from IPv6 clients.
* There are already numerous v4/v6 transition and interoperability technologies, and seemingly little appetite for developing any more.

Bringing potential work to the IETF carries the burden of convincing others to work with you on it. You have not done this, and frankly you are unlikely to do so as the internet engineering community has decided en masse that the v4/v6 interoperability problem space has been sufficiently covered by existing technologies and has moved on to other things.

Kyle

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email