Re: Last Call: <draft-ishikawa-yrpunl-ucode-urn-01.txt> (A URN Namespace For The ucode) to Informational RFC
Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Wed, 18 January 2012 14:25 UTC
Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87A7621F87DE for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 06:25:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.487
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.487 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.887, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y05eBpd3TWKY for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 06:25:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 74D9A21F87B0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 06:25:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 18 Jan 2012 14:25:29 -0000
Received: from mail.greenbytes.de (EHLO [192.168.1.140]) [217.91.35.233] by mail.gmx.net (mp011) with SMTP; 18 Jan 2012 15:25:29 +0100
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18I9e09zBAIgUPu/Qmr2/IAmY4XAf4qlwHN9dEsJH AtPBXd2YdOkRxu
Message-ID: <4F16D655.6080002@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:25:25 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ishikawa-yrpunl-ucode-urn-01.txt> (A URN Namespace For The ucode) to Informational RFC
References: <20120117175801.2185.72220.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CADBvc9_K6NxS=2Dpz8oz8KhZKPX=mZS+quoDOoAi350gHKgLsg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADBvc9_K6NxS=2Dpz8oz8KhZKPX=mZS+quoDOoAi350gHKgLsg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:25:32 -0000
On 2012-01-17 19:27, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote: > Hello, > > Having reviewed this document, I think there is no problem with its > publication. Several tiny comments: > > 1) "RFID" in the Introduction needs expanding at first use. > > 2) ucode-value = 32hex-decimal > hex-decimal = "0" / "1" / "2" / "3" / "4" / "5" / "6" / "7" / > "8" / "9" / "A" / "B" / "C" / "D" / "E" / "F" > > may be changed to: > > ucode-value = 32HEXDIG > > and that's RFC 5234 which defines<HEXDIG> so you may refer to it later. > > 3) > > Rules for lexical equivalence: > > The entire UCODE-URN is case-sensitive. > > This is at least wrong for the first three chars in URN (the URI > scheme name "urn"), that is case-insensitive as per RFC 3986. What's > the reason for setting such regulation? > ... What's case-sensitive depends on context; for instance, when comparing XML namespace URIs or Atom IDs, everything is case-sensitive. See also <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc3986.html#rfc.section.6.2>. Best regards, Julian
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ishikawa-yrpunl-ucode-urn-0… Mykyta Yevstifeyev
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ishikawa-yrpunl-ucode-urn-0… Julian Reschke