IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: NomCom 2012-2013: Third Call for Volunteers

Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net> Thu, 02 August 2012 05:24 UTC

Return-Path: <mstjohns@comcast.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C29A311E809A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 22:24:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.157
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.157 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.046, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U65o5wNI3YS6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 22:24:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from qmta13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.27.243]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56FBD11E80D9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 22:24:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omta07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.59]) by qmta13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id hhKW1j0051GXsucADhQSCT; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 05:24:26 +0000
Received: from [10.0.1.3] ([130.129.69.209]) by omta07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id hhQF1j00C4Wubui8UhQJd7; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 05:24:24 +0000
References: <20120731044425.12307.52108.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208011848500.88006@fledge.watson.org> <3B46F876-010A-4C9D-9CC4-704211939459@frobbit.se> <501A0BDB.2040501@toshiba.co.jp>
In-Reply-To: <501A0BDB.2040501@toshiba.co.jp>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Message-Id: <B7C97596-8D01-4705-A0F8-657401C84093@comcast.net>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (9B206)
From: Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: NomCom 2012-2013: Third Call for Volunteers
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 22:24:17 -0700
To: Yoshihiro Ohba <yoshihiro.ohba@toshiba.co.jp>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 05:24:27 -0000

I reported both when I volunteered.  

Sent from my iPad

On Aug 1, 2012, at 22:10, Yoshihiro Ohba <yoshihiro.ohba@toshiba.co.jp> wrote:

> What is the exact definition of "affiliation" in IETF?
> 
> If a consultant who runs his/her own consulting company X is paid by his/her customer company Y for his/her IETF activities including NOMCOM activity, then what is his/her affiliation?
> 
> Yoshihiro Ohba
> 
> (2012/08/02 11:13), Patrik Fältström wrote:
>> 2 aug 2012 kl. 00:59 skrev Samuel Weiler <weiler@watson.org>:
>> 
>>> Sorting that list by affiliation and counting the number of names from each affiliation, the volunteer list as of Monday included:
>>> 
>>> 16 Huawai
>>> 15 Cisco
>>> 13 Ericsson
>>> 9 Juniper
>>> 5 ZTE
>>> 4 Nokia/Siemens (debatable; see details)
>>> 3 Alcatel-Lucent
>>> 3 BBN
>>> 3 China Mobile
>>> 3 CNNIC
>>> 2 Time Warner Cable
>>> 1 (22)
>>> Total: 98
>>> 
>>> Observations: the top four companies on this list have contributed more than half of the NomCom volunteers.  The top three have contributed twice as many (44) as all of the entities that contributed only one (22).
>> 
>> A good thing is that the "one" category is still the largest.
>> 
>> Without arguing against you regarding this being something one should keep an eye on.
>> 
>>    Patrik
>> 
>> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email