Re: NomCom 2012-2013: Third Call for Volunteers
Yoshihiro Ohba <yoshihiro.ohba@toshiba.co.jp> Thu, 02 August 2012 05:11 UTC
Return-Path: <yoshihiro.ohba@toshiba.co.jp>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B050121F8AD9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 22:11:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.089
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.089 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h8jEfg1PuifS for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 22:11:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imx12.toshiba.co.jp (imx12.toshiba.co.jp [61.202.160.132]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FCC821F8B4C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 22:10:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from arc11.toshiba.co.jp ([133.199.90.127]) by imx12.toshiba.co.jp with ESMTP id q725AvQJ024785 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 14:10:57 +0900 (JST)
Received: (from root@localhost) by arc11.toshiba.co.jp id q725Au23013079 for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 14:10:56 +0900 (JST)
Received: from ovp11.toshiba.co.jp [133.199.90.148] by arc11.toshiba.co.jp with ESMTP id QAA13078; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 14:10:56 +0900
Received: from mx2.toshiba.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ovp11.toshiba.co.jp with ESMTP id q725AuDi005476 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 14:10:56 +0900 (JST)
Received: from tsbpoa.po.toshiba.co.jp by toshiba.co.jp id q725Aud8008568; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 14:10:56 +0900 (JST)
Received: from [133.199.17.4] by mail.po.toshiba.co.jp (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTPA id <0M84006VC3Q5YHM0@mail.po.toshiba.co.jp> for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 14:10:56 +0900 (JST)
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 14:10:51 +0900
From: Yoshihiro Ohba <yoshihiro.ohba@toshiba.co.jp>
Subject: Re: NomCom 2012-2013: Third Call for Volunteers
In-reply-to: <3B46F876-010A-4C9D-9CC4-704211939459@frobbit.se>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Message-id: <501A0BDB.2040501@toshiba.co.jp>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
References: <20120731044425.12307.52108.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208011848500.88006@fledge.watson.org> <3B46F876-010A-4C9D-9CC4-704211939459@frobbit.se>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 05:11:03 -0000
What is the exact definition of "affiliation" in IETF? If a consultant who runs his/her own consulting company X is paid by his/her customer company Y for his/her IETF activities including NOMCOM activity, then what is his/her affiliation? Yoshihiro Ohba (2012/08/02 11:13), Patrik Fältström wrote: > 2 aug 2012 kl. 00:59 skrev Samuel Weiler <weiler@watson.org>: > >> Sorting that list by affiliation and counting the number of names from each affiliation, the volunteer list as of Monday included: >> >> 16 Huawai >> 15 Cisco >> 13 Ericsson >> 9 Juniper >> 5 ZTE >> 4 Nokia/Siemens (debatable; see details) >> 3 Alcatel-Lucent >> 3 BBN >> 3 China Mobile >> 3 CNNIC >> 2 Time Warner Cable >> 1 (22) >> Total: 98 >> >> Observations: the top four companies on this list have contributed more than half of the NomCom volunteers. The top three have contributed twice as many (44) as all of the entities that contributed only one (22). > > A good thing is that the "one" category is still the largest. > > Without arguing against you regarding this being something one should keep an eye on. > > Patrik > >
- Re: NomCom 2012-2013: Third Call for Volunteers Samuel Weiler
- Re: NomCom 2012-2013: Third Call for Volunteers Donald Eastlake
- RE: NomCom 2012-2013: Third Call for Volunteers Perala, Timo (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: NomCom 2012-2013: Third Call for Volunteers SM
- Re: NomCom 2012-2013: Third Call for Volunteers Patrik Fältström
- Re: NomCom 2012-2013: Third Call for Volunteers Yoshihiro Ohba
- Re: NomCom 2012-2013: Third Call for Volunteers Michael StJohns
- Re: NomCom 2012-2013: Third Call for Volunteers Samuel Weiler
- Re: NomCom 2012-2013: Third Call for Volunteers t.p.
- Re: NomCom 2012-2013: Third Call for Volunteers Yoshihiro Ohba
- Re: NomCom 2012-2013: Third Call for Volunteers Randy Bush
- Re: NomCom 2012-2013: Third Call for Volunteers Noel Chiappa