IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nfsv4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout-06.txt> (Parallel NFS (pNFS) SCSI Layout) to Proposed Standard

Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Mon, 18 July 2016 08:14 UTC

Return-Path: <hch@lst.de>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4886B12D0F7; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 01:14:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.187
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.187 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zpi83hIvG4CC; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 01:14:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from newverein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3865912B008; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 01:14:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by newverein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 5B6CD68DAC; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 10:14:22 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 10:14:22 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Spencer Shepler <sshepler@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout-06.txt> (Parallel NFS (pNFS) SCSI Layout) to Proposed Standard
Message-ID: <20160718081422.GA22763@lst.de>
References: <20160628150730.24155.95557.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949362F5D4F49@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com> <20160718043512.GA19492@lst.de> <CO2PR03MB2280A5E37C65181124E638A6C7360@CO2PR03MB2280.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CO2PR03MB2280A5E37C65181124E638A6C7360@CO2PR03MB2280.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/4UXWcz6GXAf-YZ1AlWLRWgmMJhI>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout@ietf.org>, "Black, David" <david.black@emc.com>, "nfsv4@ietf.org" <nfsv4@ietf.org>, "nfsv4-chairs@ietf.org" <nfsv4-chairs@ietf.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 08:14:26 -0000

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 05:50:02AM +0000, Spencer Shepler wrote:
> 
> Updated draft is fine with me (if the question was for Spencer S. instead of Spencer D).

The question was for you, but i guess Spencer D should also have a say
here now that you mention it.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email