Re: [nfsv4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout-06.txt> (Parallel NFS (pNFS) SCSI Layout) to Proposed Standard

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 18 July 2016 08:28 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55AD212D150; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 01:28:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KCkPES5_XYab; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 01:28:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x232.google.com (mail-yw0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B24F612D09F; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 01:28:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x232.google.com with SMTP id l125so153377296ywb.2; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 01:28:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=jy5OxxZtosLlKFsjwkTXWEdp6xod7E7XlxQ/aoQ4/7U=; b=fCP+xllvCrBHBki2ZVKtxmyd0sNUtIrABSK7xA0WhRv33e4a0wv8mkKaaNitnfEYPL 043a46yaJsklbU1JkrVqSHWuPGjpAkPv4ciou9nLuOAJcEoDUbhbSVzfzWnLmGVbcOYP U86b7q2Ax0SdOs6uEZ3kXqLcqXaE8cS5iFLENcEZ7fdjcUgX9vQr/RXjD/YDQFNrwZSq 8xHdCLdggA0RoJcLw5Px5ZNX7Ou49l7DMdIbykXaKadd6Wf20bim2WBXa/tY7j/U5fqy 476JrC56d0qAAOymcRG7Dlkqkxty5IwPqKYL0NuyB8mp558tcyEvz/94hA+Ne9wG3oQU /oYQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=jy5OxxZtosLlKFsjwkTXWEdp6xod7E7XlxQ/aoQ4/7U=; b=iT7cJzF7Dv8+vLXLVTRbUExQ99kjtwrKkaNdBeGQDLuB5FTrYVv464Ln/s4HT558YO 7hEFoRtR2o8amyBbfvWaO51yt8ThTLDkzppHfCoEVF3EbQ+O05M92iULTp5tZYIzVDmm EzHrGSY5W7VuzMKxC0SDPe9cwYiEWdEI2MMWcFCaFn1TdXTUEsB0lntcZ+XVWLlTMoDm oDdz1PJAhd9P6PnbA+kM6wHJuYJGAzIb+yGLMs9ZMSOFb6ENRW3p4s4iXdaQ81+UK9Pf Hwqi9NdkmTvfZ8tcKXc1uEvpCP9B1lGn7TBhrVeAj6HOACu0/Espj+0moF6i18a1l6hT jZVg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKwE//BAAnqoW/QbRLmxG5bv2CqMx15MVmLees8AAYP04cxjWrpBAQNlYSEwbZHDmNxSg6LEaG4sqEvUw==
X-Received: by 10.37.73.195 with SMTP id w186mr22392405yba.90.1468830494979; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 01:28:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.231.20 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 01:28:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20160718081422.GA22763@lst.de>
References: <20160628150730.24155.95557.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949362F5D4F49@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com> <20160718043512.GA19492@lst.de> <CO2PR03MB2280A5E37C65181124E638A6C7360@CO2PR03MB2280.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <20160718081422.GA22763@lst.de>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 10:28:14 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-duLy2MM6yhRU5ZMdRwQ_skc4geSZFBc--YALTJJV3Fqw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout-06.txt> (Parallel NFS (pNFS) SCSI Layout) to Proposed Standard
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c095566e37aeb0537e4bfed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/sNh3Xc9vj91lR-0UvTCu0xMQuWg>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout@ietf.org>, "Black, David" <david.black@emc.com>, "nfsv4-chairs@ietf.org" <nfsv4-chairs@ietf.org>, "nfsv4@ietf.org" <nfsv4@ietf.org>, Spencer Shepler <sshepler@microsoft.com>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 08:28:17 -0000

Hi, Christoph,

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 05:50:02AM +0000, Spencer Shepler wrote:
> >
> > Updated draft is fine with me (if the question was for Spencer S.
> instead of Spencer D).
>
> The question was for you, but i guess Spencer D should also have a say
> here now that you mention it.
>

Spencer S. is your shepherd, so you can take your cue from him, but he's
right - Last Call has completed, so submitting an updated draft that
reflects the comments you've received is fine.

I'll watch for an updated draft to move this to IESG evaluation.

Thanks for your good work!

Spencer