Re: Last Call: <draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request-14.txt> (IANA Reserved IPv4 Prefix for Shared Address Space) to BCP

Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us> Wed, 15 February 2012 03:39 UTC

Return-Path: <dougb@dougbarton.us>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 659BF21E8030 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:39:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.589
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.589 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.010, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a-jreZ+5B5FD for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:39:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx22.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A85E21E8055 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:39:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 1243 invoked by uid 399); 15 Feb 2012 03:39:32 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO 172-17-150-251.globalsuite.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@12.207.105.210) by mail2.fluidhosting.com with ESMTPAM; 15 Feb 2012 03:39:32 -0000
X-Originating-IP: 12.207.105.210
X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us
Message-ID: <4F3B28F3.4070607@dougbarton.us>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:39:31 -0800
From: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us>
Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120213 Thunderbird/10.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request-14.txt> (IANA Reserved IPv4 Prefix for Shared Address Space) to BCP
References: <CB5FF399.1B4E7%jeff.finkelstein@cox.com> <4F3AAA08.2040204@qualcomm.com> <01OBZ9WQSHWY00ZUIL@mauve.mrochek.com> <4F3ABF6C.1030803@qualcomm.com> <m2d39hi267.wl%randy@psg.com> <4F3B09C3.1090005@qualcomm.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F3B09C3.1090005@qualcomm.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5
OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 03:39:35 -0000

On 02/14/2012 17:26, Pete Resnick wrote:
> Of course it will be used as 1918 space. That's not the point of the text.

My first reply in this most recent version of the thread pointed out
that now that we're finally willing to admit that if a new block is
issued it will be used as 1918 space then that leads to the obvious
conclusion that the *best* we can do with this draft is to kick the can
down the road, which is not enough justification for actually doing the
allocation.

I'll resist the urge to repeat the other points that I've already
repeated too often. :)

-- 

	It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short.

	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
	Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/