Re: Comments For I-D: draft-moonesamy-nomcom-eligibility-00 (was Re: The Nominating Committee Process: Eligibility)

Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us> Sat, 29 June 2013 19:43 UTC

Return-Path: <dougb@dougbarton.us>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6C2621F9F48 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Jun 2013 12:43:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.98
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.98 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.620, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aj421RcDiTqj for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Jun 2013 12:43:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dougbarton.us (dougbarton.us [IPv6:2607:f2f8:ab14::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45E3021F9B1B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 29 Jun 2013 12:43:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:d:5e7:224:e8ff:fe30:109b] (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:d:5e7:224:e8ff:fe30:109b]) by dougbarton.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8CDDE22B13 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 29 Jun 2013 19:43:39 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=dougbarton.us; s=dougbarton.us; t=1372535019; bh=fPCXgXOVd1eA+SAkX0YNPLpjU+HrTNI1p4UvwnlLNi4=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=LrdXQyF57l4H2FUQSPE7/ryVZX08WFqKzTT2gUC48qGLtG1HSeWUkTvODyvk/nzgi 4dZGLSjiZ1OdU/bW57LJy8rbIBvfq5UzgWWbwZxjWKUIhJb8qNzY0F/bRIvLbO65pY CzYthGT2FBQArzbffdpOJq3a00CyLNYtc+niOogc=
Message-ID: <51CF38EB.3080409@dougbarton.us>
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2013 12:43:39 -0700
From: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Comments For I-D: draft-moonesamy-nomcom-eligibility-00 (was Re: The Nominating Committee Process: Eligibility)
References: <20130629122851.A685A18C0D8@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20130629122851.A685A18C0D8@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2013 19:43:44 -0000

On 06/29/2013 05:28 AM, Noel Chiappa wrote:
>      > From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa)
>
>      > Yet.
>
> PS: I probably should have added a ":-)" to that. Sorry, it's early, the
> brain's not firing on all cylinders yet, and I was so entranced by the chance
> to set the record for the shortest ever IETF list e-mail... :-)

No.