Re: Comments For I-D: draft-moonesamy-nomcom-eligibility-00 (was Re: The Nominating Committee Process: Eligibility)

Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com> Sun, 30 June 2013 14:30 UTC

Return-Path: <scott.brim@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29AF021F9B35 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Jun 2013 07:30:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S+Dz9Z5s7RnI for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Jun 2013 07:30:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa0-x232.google.com (mail-oa0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::232]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B329521F9AAC for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Jun 2013 07:30:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id k7so3907207oag.37 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Jun 2013 07:30:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=5tQh8ByVmiwvHDgk3pjUh4gIA0AdiFLW8qmllXLMEY8=; b=JkIl3p/Krz3JM0CDM21xID9Y0IijeRbPj6ctM5f4NbAkzv3qWqXiSNXj9U5R9faDn5 Zzxh54td66BhF0GJXNw290NIqCPDfi8rJMarg8qo2CLl5HUpVCnUk9anmxmcU5GDNEDd z+S/TXkVUhCfqbe6GHDUN0hVFFVMt2+RAGSyAfGgR74VOx+vJPBmM85NQWTSTILujNr5 d/txlZVSoWESzCrq35C0kLSYRgSiwnbg3OKOMc1oCKzPs6CwiEaVdFomakKv3OM38j90 BKfUdAPEv1z7P05NCVpIxW7YVFXMM9GMQFJSD/bfF6iL5Rg2ZCNKTFkAlmOSBizlNHzw creg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.135.167 with SMTP id pt7mr8270011oeb.59.1372602634435; Sun, 30 Jun 2013 07:30:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.97.37 with HTTP; Sun, 30 Jun 2013 07:30:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <51CF38EB.3080409@dougbarton.us>
References: <20130629122851.A685A18C0D8@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <51CF38EB.3080409@dougbarton.us>
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 10:30:34 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPv4CP_VzcNowyDOe=MDF6vKYX44G=znPuYAy+HVfN3TVb_r9w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Comments For I-D: draft-moonesamy-nomcom-eligibility-00 (was Re: The Nominating Committee Process: Eligibility)
From: Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>
To: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b3a849c71865c04e05ff4ee"
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 14:30:38 -0000

Please someone find and share the UUCP message where the body said "I don't
understand the concern about too many message headers."