Re: Comments For I-D: draft-moonesamy-nomcom-eligibility-00 (was Re: The Nominating Committee Process: Eligibility)

jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa) Sun, 30 June 2013 14:35 UTC

Return-Path: <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98FCC21F9B81 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Jun 2013 07:35:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6y8haqSyRV3o for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Jun 2013 07:35:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.lcs.mit.edu (mercury.lcs.mit.edu [18.26.0.122]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FD2A21F9B5B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Jun 2013 07:35:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11178) id 926C018C0BF; Sun, 30 Jun 2013 10:35:13 -0400 (EDT)
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Comments For I-D: draft-moonesamy-nomcom-eligibility-00 (was Re: The Nominating Committee Process: Eligibility)
Message-Id: <20130630143513.926C018C0BF@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 10:35:13 -0400
From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 14:35:20 -0000

    > From: Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>

    > Please someone find and share the UUCP message where the body said "I
    > don't understand the concern about too many message headers."

I don't know about there being a UUCP one, but here:

  http://www.chiappa.net/~jnc/humour/net.header

is the ARPANET one.

	Noel