Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt

Rémi Denis-Courmont <remi.denis-courmont@nokia.com> Wed, 08 August 2007 07:40 UTC

Return-path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IIg9r-0000d2-Ff; Wed, 08 Aug 2007 03:40:43 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IIg9p-0000cv-GV for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2007 03:40:41 -0400
Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([131.228.20.173] helo=mgw-ext14.nokia.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IIg9o-0000K9-0J for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2007 03:40:41 -0400
Received: from esebh108.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh108.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.143.145]) by mgw-ext14.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.5/Switch-3.2.5) with ESMTP id l787eGG9017721; Wed, 8 Aug 2007 10:40:36 +0300
Received: from esebh103.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.143.33]) by esebh108.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 8 Aug 2007 10:40:21 +0300
Received: from esebh101.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.177]) by esebh103.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 8 Aug 2007 10:40:21 +0300
Received: from esdhcp05134.research.nokia.com ([172.21.51.34]) by esebh101.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 8 Aug 2007 10:40:21 +0300
From: Rémi Denis-Courmont <remi.denis-courmont@nokia.com>
Organization: Nokia TP-SP-SWD
To: ietf@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 10:40:21 +0300
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6
References: <E1IIPpu-0003xI-Ed@stiedprstage1.ietf.org> <46B96D3B.2010209@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <46B96D3B.2010209@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
X-UID: 343
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <200708081040.21714.remi.denis-courmont@nokia.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Aug 2007 07:40:21.0222 (UTC) FILETIME=[5FAF4060:01C7D98F]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 50a516d93fd399dc60588708fd9a3002
Cc:
Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

On Wednesday 08 August 2007 10:14:03 ext Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> On 2007-08-07 16:15, Internet-Drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> > directories.
> >
> >
> > 	Title		: Redesignation of 240/4 from 'Future Use" to "Limited Use for
> > Large Private Internets' Author(s)	: P. Wilson, et al.
> > 	Filename	: draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt
> > 	Pages		: 4
> > 	Date		: 2007-8-7
> >
> >    This document directs the IANA to designate the block of IPv4
> >    addresses from 240.0.0.0 to 255.255.255.255 (240.0.0.0/4) as unicast
> >    address space for limited use in large private Internets.
>
> It seems to me that we first need a discussion about why this space can't
> be released as public address space. Is it known to be already deployed
> as de facto private space?

Some widespread IPv4 stacks refuse to handle these addresses, so nobody would 
ever want to use them on the public IPv4 Internet.

---

C:\>ver

Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]

C:\>ping -n 1 247.1.2.3

Pinging 247.1.2.3 with 32 bytes of data:

Destination specified is invalid.

Ping statistics for 247.1.2.3:
    Packets: Sent = 1, Received = 0, Lost = 1 (100% loss),

---

% uname -ro
2.6.22-8-generic GNU/Linux
% ping 247.1.2.3
connect: Invalid argument


-- 
Rémi Denis-Courmont

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf