Re: IETF Mail List Failure

Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Fri, 18 May 2018 14:07 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 492C112D963; Fri, 18 May 2018 07:07:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.403
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.403 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.248, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z8tlpRfIq0df; Fri, 18 May 2018 07:07:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot0-x233.google.com (mail-ot0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 312C712D947; Fri, 18 May 2018 07:07:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot0-x233.google.com with SMTP id l13-v6so9219202otk.9; Fri, 18 May 2018 07:07:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=i+3drPA0eV78cIvN4AysiwXd+6TCkzfCNs1niejXiBk=; b=HaBKIUK5wPU/FOZfk0p38mhb6JBy/QAHv5VCzak4g6ngXmmme1eK0SWJn/NGje5Cuy JiBIBI+VMJpIOGkE/YovZ0CKXawF6FHwb+oV4VsUiiGrk/dGOfhUW8HSrTJg4puN/64f JonuqBlG9+CIpU1egVS2eEbHcZKSYmb9mOKa0mXe3dOD/ZEgaJbemk6OxYPM/yKZxzEt 4SKEU+DVMK2cQLmA3IV8wCx64qpKRN0iUP08cmVr0iFBhciOLUF2cXrYQ+0I79crw9dP 7BPL6+H2x9jZrdxNitcxONcUGoN4Xie5T6Pir3/0ZBtTdbj7q1BeBuB4ozNZk2FZDr9W bIJQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=i+3drPA0eV78cIvN4AysiwXd+6TCkzfCNs1niejXiBk=; b=rS+2GhgZWQXjIIY/QqCsi2Nxi62Tu1BbLJ3inAAZK22mfgsXDkQcQ6p2E/hM1gQK+r tEYMasX9v0pJPhgiH9TE64yBfgmG6GKLJWUgz5s4TvSxIDAhcqzHBPYNeFq00j1ERhwU c7JbDxDDKhi/ZQ/i7zAlYrURGgK0bnK3dd9kR3SYyRsieWSp7mWVlnhLwfMGxZ5dGGk/ PEQ1mAbDYxxo2twfWwLu8pkpwTO5VUf5QS/zc/jlheb1SnaTd0ZEJiI9qeyOn6x0KKy8 ZPA+D0SX1OCTGweqzJrOYDPEJXsG+b98WIWtHfw6jQfJbHV+ENyJYXxtYooF7+TEDLN8 DCyQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwcWreSDe3M6K4P5vNuQ1TB5zJRlg5xxT7G3tP8r6k49uHYdfTmw XqGNj0Ev+xO5nVW1s/uNiJutp9mX4Kt40N/y+bg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZqNknzHhYGISjPqvhl49DJLwlPJyEfygDSnPc3kvk4IFATItOZW68KVw7tLd9a29rRoygEjzPCAVAYpsujmz8M=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:2511:: with SMTP id k17-v6mr6020473otb.129.1526652467523; Fri, 18 May 2018 07:07:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: hallam@gmail.com
Received: by 2002:a9d:23:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Fri, 18 May 2018 07:07:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <m2603lieru.wl-randy@psg.com>
References: <152661185460.1578.3189815605270968957.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <m2603lieru.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 10:07:46 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: oBDAaqeMHdSl7rmKKl_UMBuO0Lc
Message-ID: <CAMm+Lwh3G6sw=fWShm6xF39hoj4WLds4huUkhnqu2vaNaJq21g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IETF Mail List Failure
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: IETF Executive Director <exec-director@ietf.org>, IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000005b434056c7b7a85"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/78kUXHkvmQV3Vu2cfp5M6OTgdfY>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 14:07:49 -0000

Thanks for the information and the effort.

But really, aren't all these issues really showing we are trying to use the
wrong tool? IETF actually has a protocol that is purpose designed for
running mailing lists and obviates the need for DMARC hell - NNTP.

NNTP is actually two separate protocols. There is the server-server
replication protocol which was really important when NNTP was designed and
is no longer needed and doesn't scale. And then there is the client-server
interaction which is actually really useful.





On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 3:50 AM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:

> > On 17 May, from 17:48 UTC (13:48 EDT) to 23:48 UTC (18:49 EDT),
> > outbound email from the IETF email lists failed to send. Mail sent to
> > the lists went into the archives, but was not received by list
> > subscribers.
> >
> > A problem in the DMARC-rewriting system caused outbound mail delivery
> > to fail silently, without alarm or error message. The rewriting system
> > has been taken offline, which restored outbound email service.  The
> > lists are back up.
> >
> > Unfortunately, because the mail was discarded rather than queued, if
> > you sent mail to any IETF list today during the outage window, we ask
> > you to please resend your message.
> >
> > We apologize for this issue and are working with the Tools Team to
> > correct the system before it is put back online again.
>
> thanks, alexa.  these things happen, and i won't even demand a refund :)
> sympathies for the pain.
>
> < micro-management = off >
>
> i really appreciate technical details.  there are still a few operators
> left in the ietf community, and we try to learn from our oopsies.  a
> deeper post mortem would even be welcome as many of us are also trying
> to deal with dmarc hell.  you run a medium scale mail operation and any
> lessons you share are appreciated.
>
> randy
>
>