Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise levels

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Wed, 11 February 2015 16:57 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1867D1A89FC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 08:57:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FMjXumTPWp24 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 08:57:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A72151A89FA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 08:57:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0761F2CCAD; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 18:57:43 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OIEg-irIc8Bh; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 18:57:42 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EED282CC4D; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 18:57:40 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D933EED8-A4BC-456E-A59A-755AFD9BD5D0"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject: Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise levels
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <54D9398C.8000805@qti.qualcomm.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:57:38 +0800
Message-Id: <01B54CDE-C67E-4CA9-B448-BDFEE274A179@piuha.net>
References: <54D903C0.6050209@gmail.com> <54D91478.4060303@nostrum.com> <54D9398C.8000805@qti.qualcomm.com>
To: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/7Ob-9FdNRDIBk-ijCV2-b7NbNo8>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 16:57:46 -0000

FWIW, like Pete I fully agree with the need to keep information copied
at a sensible level. And like him, I think it is important to keep WGs 
informed about major issues coming from the IESG (including 
Discusses). We just need to cut the noise out of it… one way or 
the other.

jari