plenary discussion about WG use of meeting space and times
Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Wed, 20 July 2016 18:10 UTC
Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 868DD12D9B3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 11:10:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.808
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.808 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kiFDaNnVXXLV for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 11:10:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A743512D9AD for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 11:10:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2746; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1469038242; x=1470247842; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:mime-version; bh=IjHiDwXRv6e9QAZbp+mHe+Qw9nvvDF26GgQUkuf/os4=; b=TcwXhvIP7oVDR5z8VOpQmUD5bRFsyp02G+QO+XrPuzWS88lO3K2PCz6o NQfgiebATkrJaTHg0kDKKOlfT4UqWox4xbtyN/0IKzH+ZSyLUk7T/M0Pv 2HprwYASKwSOrr7FLnWgJOTo+dyi9ZLrjpuvXMpM/eQdeFKpkb19/FpPG Q=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 481
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DSCADMvY9X/xbLJq1dhBUquyyIHAEBAQEBAWYnhQaBMwJsCAEBiCygB49jjgcOiCKHYYI1gloFmSaDN4FuiT2JUoVnkCBUgTqCOzqHWQEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,395,1464652800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="638711221"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Jul 2016 18:10:40 +0000
Received: from [10.61.69.31] (ams3-vpn-dhcp1311.cisco.com [10.61.69.31]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u6KIAeF2022192 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 18:10:40 GMT
To: ietf@ietf.org
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Subject: plenary discussion about WG use of meeting space and times
Message-ID: <bf185fdd-019b-3f2c-910c-5d57566753f3@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 20:10:39 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gHM0j4XQ2a00cipPS2DHTELLaCjgEa7Vl"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/80hzGh4FWFlwplG5_cfCKX9ijDU>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 18:10:44 -0000
In today's IESG plenary, there was a discussion about how to allocate meeting time to WGs. One suggestion made that was quickly taken to task was that there should be more unstructured time a'la side meetings and ad hocs. The reason it was taken to task was that people rightly fear that dissenters, newcomers, and remote participants would be at a disadvantage. There is something of a middle ground here that perhaps could be explored. Borrowing from another standards organization, when a breakout meeting is required, it is announced and all are invited. That breakout goes off and usually resolves whatever issue there is and comes back to the group to explain the result. One approach, therefore, would be to follow Michael Richardson's suggestion to shorten WG times, but perhaps provide for announced breakouts where rooms are assigned, and where AV is available. Those meetings might take place at lunch, after dinner, before the first normal WG meeting of the day, etc. These ad hocs would focus on a single task or area. Multiple ad hocs might occur simultaneously, even from the same WG. This idea would clearly require other changes, and would probably cost money. But perhaps it's an idea to consider. The benefit is that those working on particularly gnarly issues can get some additional time all together. The reason that Marc held so many interims was that httpbis needed more than two hours in a week. Eliot
- Re: plenary discussion about WG use of meeting sp… Michael Richardson
- plenary discussion about WG use of meeting space … Eliot Lear