Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-06

Luigi Iannone <> Mon, 08 February 2016 11:16 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id A15FD1ACF58 for <>; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 03:16:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vt_84-AJTyZB for <>; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 03:16:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A5ED1ACF0A for <>; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 03:16:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id p63so110692499wmp.1 for <>; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 03:16:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20150623; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=p1F+jEfqWuYA/oANWvxY+1xzwkB0lkM2i+afUNKRv/A=; b=nEBqcdlAtEbus3v/LNBffWXDXwd2cUvBSSJtZzzgM4GAvtoc+kQ2ff/fG9cj4X5KQd eOOKUpd8L6vjJUVbhtOTihrjkOdHcw1j+oS9mxptEGHkJUyIavl/tmlWIgLlD2Rz8lnL r4qPVnKEUJ7QpQvFYfWULiZQ6/U0xo4Vo3S6wkfKjpEXo2vcTFxzBVFTZR0H5zWgsVAM 8mJ4FiY9PBzYBIzLNVfXqHcBwJezgsbTj7bu9Q+mbrwr3x5/c0TTgPRBR6A3/t3/vD8X 8cvi8mvjZwRRZl72UZhY9EQUc0orxdpBM2jJZ3qhEMuchPhMNCWywkKpUeYAkpeNKDuj ATRA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=p1F+jEfqWuYA/oANWvxY+1xzwkB0lkM2i+afUNKRv/A=; b=LESE7iczVnbdeLaJR2XblNVjRgvK/np2hQgejUodDkfBgz2T/7HviiyiBw28OSWL88 hq7ZVqb4nluhRmB48b/xTr3oWmawRskvwj0VUP2Yno1tGb/+ivpdA4UXSr3xVfKFmqsc kE94Ur7JrlaMrs6A4zcn46CvH+WoM8BmFU4efxKLU90UgqLcTi46zyfsr5IIk8yMSQLh oAkfhEkYr6SBrsoRe1/gUEaG64b6N26r9rrHsqlV5xvIlI79sJyrXSPtuGXCjzilv2KN CokKN/OZh3X5bN70fE0doF7ceP40Ad+XJdsiw4imk+LadABxlYc9n5qwbV3EqnYjSc6q NMPA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORa85WsKQmsOOGPtlDiVOBdKygZZkQaiSUnQ5+qcPppcKB3U2H8v49nAqjlcNBpKQ==
X-Received: by with SMTP id w10mr26666410wja.159.1454930204025; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 03:16:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:660:330f:38:a823:a32a:7502:c5fe? ([2001:660:330f:38:a823:a32a:7502:c5fe]) by with ESMTPSA id s2sm28352596wjs.39.2016. (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 08 Feb 2016 03:16:42 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\))
Subject: Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-06
From: Luigi Iannone <>
In-Reply-To: <004001d1608f$ef60e6b0$ce22b410$>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 12:17:11 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <>
References: <004001d1608f$ef60e6b0$ce22b410$>
To: Peter Yee <>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112)
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 11:16:51 -0000

Hi Peter,

Back in April we indeed did not sent you a specific feedback. 
Reason is that we received several comments/reviews and batched everything in a new I-D, with sending specific feedback to all.

Yet, if you are unsatisfied on how we addressed the issues we certainly need to do more work.

Give me some time to go again thoroughly through your first review and I’ll get back to you with a specific feedback.

Thanks for your time spent on this document.



> On 06 Feb 2016, at 04:39, Peter Yee <> wrote:
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft.  The General Area Review
> Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for
> the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just like any other last call
> comment.  For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
> <>
> Document: draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-06
> Reviewer: Peter Yee
> Review Date: February 5, 2016
> IETF LC End Date: February 5, 2016
> IESG Telechat date: February 18, 2016
> Summary: This draft has serious issues, described in the review, and needs
> to be rethought. [Not ready]
> The draft attempts to specify the framework for the management of
> experimental LISP EID sub-prefixes, but really could use some additional
> work to flesh out the management aspects that are left unsaid.
> This draft fixes only two minor nits I raised in my review of the -04
> version.  Nothing else has been addressed, nor have I received any feedback
> on that review.  In light of this, I have little new to add.  It is possible
> that the agreement between the IANA and the RIPE NCC will alleviate the
> major concern I had with the draft, but not being privy to that agreement, I
> can't make that determination.
> My original review with the unaddressed comments can be found here: