IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: .org sale - bidding process

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Fri, 17 January 2020 22:36 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07ABD120086 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 14:36:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6HAbZP9jQuWp for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 14:36:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x234.google.com (mail-lj1-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6FBE120026 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 14:36:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x234.google.com with SMTP id q8so4240813ljj.11 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 14:36:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=C07RSUEzmz1e5pT80+JzYdlV1nDjKJFYqzxX3fkXirc=; b=hqan1L4a485PYrb+X7lbrn/NQeSnqxm+6T5I0jysmU9PqtQ2MWHtO48hyj+fOkkgVc rYytTSGXNzWr0aqm9QkOsQdpX3kgcoG9Orba06QR9Ldhu5JERoeVD8vpSi+zLnDVEktc c4i/OGOm0xrlv3LXdNCubiXaF7evyOE6txhOMnFYUzAG1dv8Nqi/fuEIRgIHUpKeRX7I GmmqQastrTbg/F7EHLaYPzJkmYhf3TwQSl5vMGG+5xElBHoTMQG3KXKcna8CAfam58CW +/VyQnVoJAuuBhJxoPxDC9feMuB9M1vmbl8qhAW6lOSHhmIwo1S6p+szD4TTbLR1kG0I hmgg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=C07RSUEzmz1e5pT80+JzYdlV1nDjKJFYqzxX3fkXirc=; b=rx6x1CbXCxmISnWtW6jZsUSTe37kWc90lB0/2q59gQYgiEFFW+UpDk+FsrUTnXD+uw /AKsQOMSleEKsy6X2O6sSvUOb+Bw/VGwmfDFCiZGJUTcJuuO1M3dsOSoTNL0fhF/Xt1u y3cF5qgHWydbP98KcnXykz1IccTHAVTuWo8BX3ib4/mc6FiVwCAJIyUqw0cjDmeQ5I83 F/5H4Ff63rxXKwGxEHeRP1SN8iO0Ex6o9ugMU7f7Gx7mg+b6a+MSy1vjgzzsL5o7njjv HOt0xwkDjqVHsClumlqPDDh7YclQ2z5xQF1CjU80qvEp0pQogRpQfAz2xF0eiOofugFw ICWA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUiOoYNAq4rFFKmg6qGFxYv3dsVSeMjlt9Acfwf0lD1vqiEeBwm zGIibqx+ftCCrNGDoyTZBdvNhJ6ZH0MsVOBRAtop3Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw8Uj39ivVDBOz2U8Wcgo04VOKYaIxvYRthkK1PnfpbmHn7z+J3zw5OHoY66/hm0+cK2/ZeN0t+rddKlnqI5IU=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9e43:: with SMTP id g3mr7020657ljk.37.1579300563146; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 14:36:03 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAChr6SzL7NcnEQ7J7C+zxF28faHUzHOPQuhtuNCN6z9Z1M9Hvg@mail.gmail.com> <20200117174531.tzvaerhqtkwzkxhj@mx4.yitter.info> <m2muallp1e.wl-randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2muallp1e.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 14:35:27 -0800
Message-ID: <CABcZeBMTm8jyxWyBUn1yYRuuCwgTnj8ME16vOSfU-N2ZbNopyg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: .org sale - bidding process
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <sullivan@isoc.org>, IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000f6c7f059c5d9110"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/8hSuz6xY4u_crbQUQ2lIZNtOOFk>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 22:36:09 -0000

On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 2:03 PM Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:

> perhaps "I don't think the IETF list is a good place to discuss the PIR
> transactio" does not have the best cosmetics for a subject where folk
> have expressed concern of discussion suppression.
>

This seems like an argument that really proves too much. Suppose someone
wanted to discuss the US presidential election on the IETF list and then
expressed concern over discussion suppression, would that mean it was bad
optics to suggest that the IETF list wasn't the best place?

-Ekr


> randy
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email