IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Forum Suggestion from IETF SAA [RE: .org sale - bidding process]

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Sun, 19 January 2020 14:34 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65EC5120044 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 06:34:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0KKhb-AUFcwc for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 06:34:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F1A912001B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 06:34:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 430D421B82; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 09:34:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 19 Jan 2020 09:34:56 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=jTTw5FSqWyaqgGDq/i3lfFkh9bBuiWksfff7zaBHO gs=; b=uiDq4bw88/vHrp7xsjof0FLy+XgT1ZmCpbqnhPj6LQ/igBn0812sUHAYb br/z9CwN9wHF5RCF3Lvz77QjSdl+OfzOhl3sjhI7pK/E7SICkE3wUNLv15KiDtVK 5XA/nig/HGzp4cvGSMHH89l1BS8ZFITEx9PxAeBGQnNy39BMaNreSPyQarx7buar NgeuiCDVAXLVptnqZ/CXAYId2Gcw1WLd1VSMRecbHhQG5mZ682zzbjsd9Awlw5ub iLsEKJQ1yXk6xysPnn76s+RsGJvUhqV/wQqHX8dlh9s2wYSlcZ1l52ni1e0QXcdw WeV2QMab+Waa8LlljqMdWV3wOO8ew==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:D2kkXu5aq-IBvIhaMXuMCAVUVOYS0rOb0ORyC0e5UINRWybCuebrLw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrudefgdeihecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepuffvfhfhkffffgggjggtgfesthejre dttdefjeenucfhrhhomhepmfgvihhthhcuofhoohhrvgcuoehmohhorhgvsehnvghtfiho rhhkqdhhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomheqnecukfhppedutdekrddvvddurddukedtrdduhe enucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhoohhrvgesnhgvthifohhrkhdqhhgvrhgv thhitghsrdgtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:D2kkXj-eJLAwV-hW_gwdwbyj_Z_S_qPbGFltnhXx1vyJ-EeJxqMBNA> <xmx:D2kkXm0BdZeHf5oQZBVTqHuoMAyrQygxzYY1dT7QTuQAWQL4Zd-Ysw> <xmx:D2kkXjVgLTaAkwhpJeDXLyFPk5yJpWDE6WzA8q0uDt3UPlWWvJJrKA> <xmx:EGkkXvUEUpjTRAAhNMf-UBV9jtAFymrkiJQoa8JXYOC2tIqrT_ruwg>
Received: from [192.168.1.97] (108-221-180-15.lightspeed.knvltn.sbcglobal.net [108.221.180.15]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 757333060B1E; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 09:34:55 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: Forum Suggestion from IETF SAA [RE: .org sale - bidding process]
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <CAChr6SzL7NcnEQ7J7C+zxF28faHUzHOPQuhtuNCN6z9Z1M9Hvg@mail.gmail.com> <91b0323b-a2d3-a8e3-0bce-86a53c04fba2@ietf.org>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Message-ID: <503dd3a8-8659-7525-3b43-f9c1c5b4e3ae@network-heretics.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2020 09:34:53 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <91b0323b-a2d3-a8e3-0bce-86a53c04fba2@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/WDnJ4iLnUyXIjgFIft8yqc1V6hk>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2020 14:34:58 -0000

On 1/17/20 10:33 PM, Sergeant-at-Arms wrote:

> And as per the IETF
> discussion list charter [5], we suggest that the discussions should be
> moved to the more specific forum identified.

I don't think RFC 3005 was ever intended to be used as an excuse to move 
a discussion out of the IETF or to suppress discussion within IETF.

Please reconsider.

Keith

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email