IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: .org sale - bidding process

Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> Fri, 17 January 2020 19:44 UTC

Return-Path: <tbray@textuality.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5565F1200D6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 11:44:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=textuality-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qyJxvbCuzL8g for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 11:44:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd32.google.com (mail-io1-xd32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5054E1200A4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 11:44:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd32.google.com with SMTP id c16so27256650ioh.6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 11:44:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=textuality-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=YhibBWd6xhvpCEhH/gyh6gG6PGHtm/75oLx/TnwVxww=; b=mYRQmvciTB2HMctO3BfGUbGNPrbUn3ExsI0pQoADowUQpIEsDysuA4qM1EgjxtI+6C lJ3gNaDOrPbxi4CCoaHfQEOW8PkQhJe+PwBMCrHKMSIju+LzsRHOFYEex84wMKnqxlaW +oygXaX4/WAU4N5HDZK2EyvTfl/D0xoenJ1lB/Geux9oo2Ba6ny0Wc3C7WEEQfFeMvVx YRbYaZD90+n8iLWvK/ZUAiAX6MFrHdjhTkC19ubyy02xHTQni5sgCYgZ9ceZCCf+dsgq T4IciFfBQz4VXBp9zK3CIyUm7fsiobAj/g0np1QEcWA2uEBfbIMTOkLB7eVLz1/X3lju MkUQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=YhibBWd6xhvpCEhH/gyh6gG6PGHtm/75oLx/TnwVxww=; b=VplTJKwVbjSjrUyl4B4s1rxIsBjPYMwxDcEEY2+BgQD4AXOaqwkHFNGlc8Kup4hP+U ROBJPkVzSOOH5PrwDxXNRE0QycpzvPOlJ/LwxIKtsLq2VEgpU83jPMTXb7sHjmkAE0PC DY4oU9LvTvAW4t4GGnuLkKEfwSt7POpqBUjEzzFJyfLFAd6RlzogNyWVQ0S2i5S/ZHpC lin8LL7gS4OKGxVJ9jJXB10w08G/VuGwuSYlAlzmzgrKyrn8EulzOflhrNGG7ulUGJh5 KEkbXrhlHZzjnOpW0obuLbU9JElti1yIQ/xQrKt7TBhmIOXCUNomkSUk0mrAus3yWV1v 6PJA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWUUvJGbnid55t00vVAaydI+X069D4vJ1/Ws8GDJts0pGrozINI tVYk3zTMpvTsb3+BzycxBVkpMO6ATLPLohhfT6cIhQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyAjVeXdq37MJJlkSQOuyVbKkx3HglfzeTp97xFvvvPSZBJa2sjtQKUApy6x+I4J7NiED7w4vAVhyFSxYPd5f4=
X-Received: by 2002:a5e:940f:: with SMTP id q15mr30152547ioj.218.1579290257586; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 11:44:17 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAChr6SzL7NcnEQ7J7C+zxF28faHUzHOPQuhtuNCN6z9Z1M9Hvg@mail.gmail.com> <20200117174531.tzvaerhqtkwzkxhj@mx4.yitter.info>
In-Reply-To: <20200117174531.tzvaerhqtkwzkxhj@mx4.yitter.info>
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 11:44:06 -0800
Message-ID: <CAHBU6iuFGMR2rDZAum9sYnB0Ort-BnQMdJyZg=aE3ZfsEeatog@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: .org sale - bidding process
To: Andrew Sullivan <sullivan@isoc.org>
Cc: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>, www-archive@w3.org, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>, mgodwin@rstreet.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cd1fa0059c5b2ae6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/tbBbOwXzHhbrNhXnaHjqVUA_CYU>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 19:44:22 -0000

On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 9:46 AM Andrew Sullivan <sullivan@isoc.org> wrote:

>
> I've said before that I don't think the IETF list is a good place to
> discuss the PIR transaction, and unless the Sergeants-at-Arms disagree
> with me I'm going to maintain that position.  (I see even less reason
> for this to be on a W3C list.)  I'll respond to this question
>

I'm inclined to disagree - ietf@ feels like an appropriate place to
discuss, since this is of substantial concern to the Internet-engineering
community.

But I might be wrong - is there another place that clearly is an
appropriate home for this discussion?  Thanks in advance.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email