Re: how about talking about the Content *inside* the venue?
Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com> Tue, 18 October 2005 11:29 UTC
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ERpf2-0002Vm-CI; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 07:29:40 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ERpf0-0002Vg-0n for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 07:29:38 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA22737 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 07:29:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mtagate1.de.ibm.com ([195.212.29.150]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ERpqW-0001qf-CF for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 07:41:32 -0400
Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate1.de.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j9IBTSrO152304 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 11:29:28 GMT
Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.228]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VERS6.7) with ESMTP id j9IBTSr4226414 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 13:29:28 +0200
Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j9IBTSpi004948 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 13:29:28 +0200
Received: from sihl.zurich.ibm.com (sihl.zurich.ibm.com [9.4.16.232]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j9IBTRvP004945; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 13:29:27 +0200
Received: from zurich.ibm.com (sig-9-145-129-216.de.ibm.com [9.145.129.216]) by sihl.zurich.ibm.com (AIX4.3/8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA65362; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 13:29:26 +0200
Message-ID: <4354DC95.4010109@zurich.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 13:29:25 +0200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
Organization: IBM
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
X-Accept-Language: en, fr, de
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
References: <4354D3ED.60706@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4354D3ED.60706@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cf4fa59384e76e63313391b70cd0dd25
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: how about talking about the Content *inside* the venue?
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Eliot Lear wrote:
>
> We have in my opinion had a consistently low operator turnout. I wonder
> if it would be possible for us to align our conference dates in such a
> way as to overlap with NANOG, RIPE, USENIX, LISA, and other appropriate
> conferences so that we can get some crossover?
That tends to be inconsistent with the past requests to schedule well
in advance. We have dates fixed through the end of 2007, and it's getting
to the time when we ought to fix dates for 2008.
We certainly need the right balance of participation between suppliers,
operators and large users. We are short of both the latter, IMHO.
Brian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- Re: how about talking about the Content *inside* … Brian E Carpenter
- how about talking about the Content *inside* the … Eliot Lear
- Re: how about talking about the Content *inside* … Lars Eggert
- Re: how about talking about the Content *inside* … Theodore Ts'o
- Re: how about talking about the Content *inside* … Marshall Eubanks