Re: how about talking about the Content *inside* the venue?

Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@netlab.nec.de> Tue, 18 October 2005 11:29 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ERpeW-0002P7-Rq; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 07:29:08 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ERpeS-0002O3-MH for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 07:29:06 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA22724 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 07:28:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtp0.netlab.nec.de ([195.37.70.40]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ERppy-0001qG-5H for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 07:40:59 -0400
Received: from venus.office (ftp.netlab.nec.de [10.1.1.25]) by smtp0.netlab.nec.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C65717DC8; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 13:28:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from n-eggert.office ([10.1.1.112]) by venus.office over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 18 Oct 2005 13:28:54 +0200
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by n-eggert.office (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8371F361B3D; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 13:28:53 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <4354D3ED.60706@cisco.com>
References: <4354D3ED.60706@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v734)
Message-Id: <874F3341-9317-49ED-B00C-B14A2FB2E2EA@netlab.nec.de>
From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@netlab.nec.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 13:28:51 +0200
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.734)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Oct 2005 11:28:54.0164 (UTC) FILETIME=[1F02E540:01C5D3D7]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: e1b0e72ff1bbd457ceef31828f216a86
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: how about talking about the Content *inside* the venue?
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1005446880=="
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

On Oct 18, 2005, at 12:52, Eliot Lear wrote:
> We have in my opinion had a consistently low operator turnout.  I  
> wonder if it would be possible for us to align our conference dates  
> in such a way as to overlap with NANOG, RIPE, USENIX, LISA, and  
> other appropriate conferences so that we can get some crossover?

We have in my opinion had a consistently low researcher turnout.  I  
wonder if it would be possible for us to align our conference dates  
in such a way as to overlap with SIGCOMM, Infocom, ICNP, and other  
appropriate conferences so that we can get some crossover?

(I'm only half joking.)

Lars
--
Lars Eggert                                     NEC Network Laboratories

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf