RE: limiting our set of cities
"Peter Yee" <peter@akayla.com> Thu, 20 February 2020 18:09 UTC
Return-Path: <peter@akayla.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B05CB120041 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 10:09:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C_jUowLLs-uY for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 10:09:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p3plsmtpa08-01.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtpa08-01.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [173.201.193.102]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 982E812001B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 10:09:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from spectre ([173.8.184.78]) by :SMTPAUTH: with ESMTPSA id 4qGCjPTQa8pFm4qGCjhJbf; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 11:09:16 -0700
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=CrTBjUwD c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=PF7/PIuz6ZQ4FM3W1XNKAQ==:117 a=PF7/PIuz6ZQ4FM3W1XNKAQ==:17 a=jpOVt7BSZ2e4Z31A5e1TngXxSK0=:19 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=z_ND41K7QKshDo5EhdsA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10
X-SECURESERVER-ACCT: peter@akayla.com
From: Peter Yee <peter@akayla.com>
To: 'Michael Richardson' <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Cc: 'IETF discussion list' <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <13820272-7189-4803-A842-EA86FE051C10@live555.com> <9B420C95-9E85-4969-ADCA-8F3AAE026396@ietf.org> <17764.1582194882@dooku> <AM0PR07MB5442CBEE05F0CE9C48818D8A92130@AM0PR07MB5442.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <24641.1582202586@dooku>
In-Reply-To: <24641.1582202586@dooku>
Subject: RE: limiting our set of cities
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 10:09:25 -0800
Message-ID: <07dc01d5e818$e2f035b0$a8d0a110$@akayla.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQHySeMTOo9kggCIe+pIAbA8wXwg/wJkkosLAkO13VMCF9QeEgGMMakJp6k5dwA=
Content-Language: en-us
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfCmn1rr6pgLH1Gxb+dlj9zO53YOR7xwMrslMl4jNgNo98HOwaG4tKegpBAnpl6AQeC8lO0g/UzqC1q5VG9sK0e4hzg1VA2kRLl3OG/oDVX5A5QtudchR ArUTufJRBWGWgX04QLagUTm1exMFlRuj4UUNRySSbqXzI87+b+Knv8Zln4+2rCt+MqqCVWRI2nJnMw==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/9U1iCdGu39JpY4qP7kNaSx1Te_A>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 18:09:20 -0000
Michael, >I don't know how much the IETF LLC plans to spend for investigation of new cities, but the previous IAOC spent some significant effort investigating new locations. >So, of course, we'll have to add if we see that we are losing things. >This is not a straight-jacket, but rather, a policy statement that we prefer returning to known-good places. >Some SDOs just keep going back to exactly the same 3-4 places. Period. >IEEE 802 has some set pattern, I think. IEEE 802 does not have a set pattern. It does repeat locations over the short term because of hotel discounts that are obtained for multiple visits to the same venue. The pool of places that IEEE 802 goes to is somewhat smaller than the IETF's pool, but has a similar aim of rotating locations around the globe. For 2020-2021, IEEE 802.11, for example, will be meeting in 11 unique locations over the course of 12 meetings. -Peter
- Re: Updated potential meeting location list JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Updated potential meeting location list Jay Daley
- Re: Updated potential meeting location list JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Updated potential meeting location list Ross Finlayson
- Re: Updated potential meeting location list Jay Daley
- limiting our set of cities Michael Richardson
- Re: limiting our set of cities Jared Mauch
- Re: limiting our set of cities Jay Daley
- Re: limiting our set of cities Michael Richardson
- Re: limiting our set of cities Michael Richardson
- RE: limiting our set of cities Maisonneuve, Julien (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)
- Re: limiting our set of cities Michal Krsek
- Re: limiting our set of cities Michael Richardson
- Re: limiting our set of cities Christian Hopps
- Re: limiting our set of cities Michael Richardson
- Re: limiting our set of cities Rodney Van Meter
- Re: limiting our set of cities Keith Moore
- Re: limiting our set of cities Christian Hopps
- Re: limiting our set of cities Livingood, Jason
- Re: Updated potential meeting location list Brian Campbell
- Re: limiting our set of cities Stewart Bryant
- Re: limiting our set of cities Andrew Sullivan
- Re: limiting our set of cities Keith Moore
- RE: limiting our set of cities Peter Yee
- Re: Updated potential meeting location list Jay Daley
- Re: limiting our set of cities Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)
- Re: limiting our set of cities Christian Hopps
- Re: limiting our set of cities Alissa Cooper
- Re: limiting our set of cities Jay Daley
- Re: limiting our set of cities Michael Richardson
- Re: limiting our set of cities Bob Hinden
- Re: Updated potential meeting location list Fred Baker