Re: limiting our set of cities

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 20 February 2020 11:40 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BCCF12004A; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 03:40:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ar13N1mxw9WH; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 03:40:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6299012001A; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 03:40:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (x59cc8baf.dyn.telefonica.de [89.204.139.175]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B69E1F458; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 11:40:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 2DC3B1A3B6D; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 12:40:45 +0100 (CET)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org>
cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: limiting our set of cities
In-reply-to: <F5DC6DBF-CC46-4532-9712-FD7573776870@ietf.org>
References: <13820272-7189-4803-A842-EA86FE051C10@live555.com> <9B420C95-9E85-4969-ADCA-8F3AAE026396@ietf.org> <17764.1582194882@dooku> <F5DC6DBF-CC46-4532-9712-FD7573776870@ietf.org>
Comments: In-reply-to Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org> message dated "Thu, 20 Feb 2020 23:55:27 +1300."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 25.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 12:40:45 +0100
Message-ID: <22294.1582198845@dooku>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/E_5JpZ4nwsMsuoNwoVj8VlWIw_4>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 11:40:50 -0000

Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org> wrote:
    >> On 20/02/2020, at 11:34 PM, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
    >> wrote:
    >>
    >>
    >> Jay, and/or Jason:
    >>
    >> Can you tell the community if the LLC has any plans/thoughts to stop
    >> looking for new places to meet, rather to just establish a list of
    >> 10-15 cities where we have successfully met, and simply repeat?

    > I don’t think that is an LLC decision to make - it’s a community
    > decision.  Having said that, my initial impression after just a few
    > months in the job is that idea would not sit well with our sponsors who
    > want to see us visit new/specific cites and countries.  Reducing
    > sponsor interest is a big risk to take.

Dear IETF LLC board,
  Do you have a plan to engage the community on how to make this decision?
  Is this a decision that you have on your radar?

----

I'd like to know about the places that our sponsors would like to see us go,
and I'd like to know if/why/how a list of 15 cities would be overly restrictive?
Again, remembering that we also have "*" to fill.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-