Re: Last Call: <draft-schoenw-opsawg-copspr-historic-03.txt> (Reclassification of COPS-PR and SPPI to Historic) to Informational RFC

thomas nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com> Fri, 04 March 2016 19:26 UTC

Return-Path: <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 141091A879C; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 11:26:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.003
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.003 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O-CJRoVIip-0; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 11:26:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lucidvision.com (lucidvision.com [64.71.170.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C03E51A1A82; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 11:26:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lucidvision.com; s=default; t=1457119573; bh=GFFxFxdhwv7l5RrkSCS8NXnOHkwPOeQqyItVid+C670=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=ueEJ9+oVqbAxdmHPCI1VqX1VId5ig4EHIhr3c5VvSb9K5mJmIMGPDGTFqE36Tk/tJ f0r19hje8iHrO3CLNCZm5Fz1+A/3ocsw9zfBD7QXdATIilTYf1ob1yOoAAZNdklTIJ t0OCK0dNOhpyjbI6rM9DlZCON0mIn+SUzeeUkEMw=
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=50.255.148.181;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-schoenw-opsawg-copspr-historic-03.txt> (Reclassification of COPS-PR and SPPI to Historic) to Informational RFC
From: thomas nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13D15)
In-Reply-To: <56D843A1.5040006@bwijnen.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 14:26:01 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D935D358-15A3-49DD-8E67-D7AB863D9083@lucidvision.com>
References: <20160302145612.4629.67555.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <56D843A1.5040006@bwijnen.net>
To: "Bert Wijnen (IETF)" <bertietf@bwijnen.net>
X-Authenticated-User: tnadeau@lucidvision.com
X-Info: aspam skipped due to (g_smite_skip_relay)
X-Encryption: SSL encrypted
X-MyRbl: Color=Yellow Age=0 Spam=0 Notspam=8 Stars=0 Good=0 Friend=4 Surbl=0 Catch=0 r=0 ip=50.255.148.181
X-IP-stats: Notspam Incoming Last 0, First 294, in=3391, out=0, spam=0 Known=true ip=50.255.148.181
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/9aki2nmR8oZsMiwRIpojP4tl6ZQ>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, draft-schoenw-opsawg-copspr-historic@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 19:26:31 -0000

Totally agree with Bert here.

tom


> On Mar 3, 2016, at 9:01 AM, Bert Wijnen (IETF) <bertietf@bwijnen.net> wrote:
> 
> I support moving COPS-PR to historic.
> As far as I know, it never really picked up traction in the industry.
> 
> Bert
> 
>> On 02/03/16 15:56, The IESG wrote:
>> 
>> The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
>> the following document:
>> - 'Reclassification of COPS-PR and SPPI to Historic'
>>   <draft-schoenw-opsawg-copspr-historic-03.txt> as Informational RFC
>> 
>> To follow the procedure 2 at http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/designating-rfcs-as-historic.html, we need an IETF Last Call for this draft. Note that https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-copspr-sppi-to-historic/ had already its 2 weeks IETF Last Call
>> 
>> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
>> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
>> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2016-03-30. Exceptionally, comments may be
>> sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
>> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>> 
>> Abstract
>> 
>> 
>>    This memo reclassifies RFC 3084, COPS Usage for Policy Provisioning,
>>    and RFC 3159, Structure of Policy Provisioning Information, to
>>    Historic status.  This memo obsoletes RFC 3084, RFC 3159, RFC 3317,
>>    RFC 3318, and RFC 3571.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The file can be obtained via
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-schoenw-opsawg-copspr-historic/
>> 
>> IESG discussion can be tracked via
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-schoenw-opsawg-copspr-historic/ballot/
>> 
>> 
>> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
>