Re: Last Call: <draft-schoenw-opsawg-copspr-historic-03.txt> (Reclassification of COPS-PR and SPPI to Historic) to Informational RFC

"Bert Wijnen (IETF)" <bertietf@bwijnen.net> Thu, 03 March 2016 14:01 UTC

Return-Path: <bertietf@bwijnen.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B4731A1EFE; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 06:01:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kLnF0W1_7vsN; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 06:01:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lb3-smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net (lb3-smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net [194.109.24.31]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 885D91A21B8; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 06:01:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Macintosh-2.fritz.box ([83.163.239.181]) by smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net with ESMTP id RS151s01Q3vXPcr01S16S3; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 15:01:07 +0100
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-schoenw-opsawg-copspr-historic-03.txt> (Reclassification of COPS-PR and SPPI to Historic) to Informational RFC
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <20160302145612.4629.67555.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: "Bert Wijnen (IETF)" <bertietf@bwijnen.net>
Message-ID: <56D843A1.5040006@bwijnen.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 15:01:05 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160302145612.4629.67555.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/q7N8i1OgcwDKq_8o8cB8YfzrX3k>
Cc: draft-schoenw-opsawg-copspr-historic@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 14:01:16 -0000

I support moving COPS-PR to historic.
As far as I know, it never really picked up traction in the industry.

Bert

On 02/03/16 15:56, The IESG wrote:
>
> The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
> the following document:
> - 'Reclassification of COPS-PR and SPPI to Historic'
>    <draft-schoenw-opsawg-copspr-historic-03.txt> as Informational RFC
>
> To follow the procedure 2 at http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/designating-rfcs-as-historic.html, we need an IETF Last Call for this draft. Note that https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-copspr-sppi-to-historic/ had already its 2 weeks IETF Last Call
>
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2016-03-30. Exceptionally, comments may be
> sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>
> Abstract
>
>
>     This memo reclassifies RFC 3084, COPS Usage for Policy Provisioning,
>     and RFC 3159, Structure of Policy Provisioning Information, to
>     Historic status.  This memo obsoletes RFC 3084, RFC 3159, RFC 3317,
>     RFC 3318, and RFC 3571.
>
>
>
>
> The file can be obtained via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-schoenw-opsawg-copspr-historic/
>
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-schoenw-opsawg-copspr-historic/ballot/
>
>
> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
>
>
>