Re: Last Call: <draft-schoenw-opsawg-copspr-historic-03.txt> (Reclassification of COPS-PR and SPPI to Historic) to Informational RFC

["Bert Wijnen (IETF)" <[e-mail]>]

I support moving COPS-PR to historic.
As far as I know, it never really picked up traction in the industry.

Bert

On 02/03/16 15:56, The IESG wrote:
>
> The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
> the following document:
> - 'Reclassification of COPS-PR and SPPI to Historic'
>    <draft-schoenw-opsawg-copspr-historic-03.txt> as Informational RFC
>
> To follow the procedure 2 at http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/designating-rfcs-as-historic.html, we need an IETF Last Call for this draft. Note that https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-copspr-sppi-to-historic/ had already its 2 weeks IETF Last Call
>
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> [e-mail] mailing lists by 2016-03-30. Exceptionally, comments may be
> sent to [e-mail] instead. In either case, please retain the
> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>
> Abstract
>
>
>     This memo reclassifies RFC 3084, COPS Usage for Policy Provisioning,
>     and RFC 3159, Structure of Policy Provisioning Information, to
>     Historic status.  This memo obsoletes RFC 3084, RFC 3159, RFC 3317,
>     RFC 3318, and RFC 3571.
>
>
>
>
> The file can be obtained via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-schoenw-opsawg-copspr-historic/
>
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-schoenw-opsawg-copspr-historic/ballot/
>
>
> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
>
>
>