Re: Security for the IETF wireless network
George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org> Fri, 25 July 2014 14:18 UTC
Return-Path: <ggm@algebras.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4819E1B2926 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 07:18:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q4Puntb-8TGS for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 07:18:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-f178.google.com (mail-pd0-f178.google.com [209.85.192.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54E881B290F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 07:18:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pd0-f178.google.com with SMTP id w10so5708192pde.23 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 07:18:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=9CrvChRcVJpAVeYRvlJCno7oX4tSSa7tWNq8S5ha6qg=; b=nJzA4j5uD+qYYdWm2JnrAM+y7D1mvQuWsAZ2MPJgupV0E9T2tu/AhGUsnQYihLZROx qmk+BnG3gg52Op1Dbb30spK2T80aVcsXpFarvcLbsbjz0PxhWtkulDZCGoRWey5EE0E2 oX1u47YyZT3mOvdP/F7xvAWdHjQzD92NewBe7e46qbUWYECxevqVJtbqcMSCG9CyCy8M uQwOKdg0zeqqwq8V8aA40EgmdLaCQmTbulct1H43XHOH7NZ22G0tnSc3uD+PgdCjdCTj WGNUosOmwQDL2UBp9OjD/Ozx+oe9Q4G8RqCpO9c/NIgO6BmFdDXLNAUCFrSh5Vvxn4vF ywjQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmTu8k9yKFnSHlETw+u8VLl8o4oTKRQjVCoOCrNAfubtrrC5N25qz9UKyxoiFfniiILAUsX
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.66.230.163 with SMTP id sz3mr4125158pac.136.1406297906971; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 07:18:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.70.131.100 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 07:18:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [2001:67c:370:184:7577:f985:c066:4df1]
In-Reply-To: <CAATsVbY44t7QvDNe4UcBfM1MpzkphZYCyHPz=Mwax95fSpjmFg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <0FE63216-9BE8-450F-80FB-D1DB6166DFEF@ietf.org> <53D17359.2030505@gmail.com> <CFF7BAFE.28A14%wesley.george@twcable.com> <53D25789.8000804@restena.lu> <CAATsVbY44t7QvDNe4UcBfM1MpzkphZYCyHPz=Mwax95fSpjmFg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 10:18:26 -0400
Message-ID: <CAKr6gn2f51ZHRA1cOjR1uwoL_TPT7nvUqTJNZK3Lewfr7oBKWg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Security for the IETF wireless network
From: George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org>
To: Bill Fenner <fenner@fenron.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b15a9993198a804ff053fcc"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/BjGYjjNFoRxby4GHuo27og82KgE
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 14:18:30 -0000
lets put the keyhash in a low rate bitstream and add it into GPS and Glonas packets. If we write the code, then we can extract it at one bit per minute or something, and every phone in the western hemisphere with Android or iOS will have the pubkey. anything else is just quiche. or, we could ritually all incant the keyhash in plenary at the mike, for the next meeting. That leaves newbies exposed to a +1 risk unti they come to another IETF.
- Re: Security for the IETF wireless network Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Security for the IETF wireless network Stefan Winter
- Re: Security for the IETF wireless network George, Wes
- Re: Security for the IETF wireless network George, Wes
- Hotel networks (Was Re: Security for the IETF wir… Steve Crocker
- Re: Security for the IETF wireless network joel jaeggli
- Re: [90all] Security for the IETF wireless network Randall Gellens
- Re: Security for the IETF wireless network Stefan Winter
- Re: Security for the IETF wireless network Tim Wicinski
- Re: [90all] Security for the IETF wireless network Randy Bush
- Re: Hotel networks (Was Re: Security for the IETF… John C Klensin
- Re: Hotel networks (Was Re: Security for the IETF… Steve Crocker
- Re: Hotel networks (Was Re: Security for the IETF… joel jaeggli
- Re: Hotel networks (Was Re: Security for the IETF… Steve Crocker
- Re: Hotel networks (Was Re: Security for the IETF… George Michaelson
- Re: Hotel networks (Was Re: Security for the IETF… John C Klensin
- Re: Hotel networks (Was Re: Security for the IETF… Stefan Winter
- Re: Security for the IETF wireless network Bill Fenner
- Re: Security for the IETF wireless network George Michaelson
- Re: Security for the IETF wireless network Stefan Winter
- Re: Security for the IETF wireless network Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Security for the IETF wireless network Bill Fenner
- Re: Security for the IETF wireless network Bill Fenner
- Re: Security for the IETF wireless network John Levine
- Re: Security for the IETF wireless network Stefan Winter
- Re: Security for the IETF wireless network Stefan Winter
- Re: Hotel networks (Was Re: Security for the IETF… Samuel Weiler
- Re: Hotel networks (Was Re: Security for the IETF… Randall Gellens
- Re: Hotel networks (Was Re: Security for the IETF… Randall Gellens
- Re: Hotel networks (Was Re: Security for the IETF… Niels Dettenbach (Syndicat IT&Internet)
- Re: Hotel networks (Was Re: Security for the IETF… Stefan Winter
- Re: Hotel networks (Was Re: Security for the IETF… Randall Gellens
- Re: Hotel networks (Was Re: Security for the IETF… Randall Gellens
- Re: Hotel networks (Was Re: Security for the IETF… Melinda Shore
- Re: Security for the IETF wireless network Michael Richardson