IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Stray thoughts on ' Update of IESG statement "Last Call Guidance to the Community"'

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Thu, 22 April 2021 22:38 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C50BA3A13BA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 15:38:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.919
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.919 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WHMw5yZ9n1BE for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 15:38:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A9AA3A13B7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 15:38:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA9DC1FAA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 18:38:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 22 Apr 2021 18:38:17 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=Vmq4LPo6rBH1ePJ7rIbToa8t9vTxZ6UMNdcEh2uRJ DE=; b=heoQ+RAq7xSrcRt/EfaXjDQq5alN3OpaoiR/7F3f4Vraxr8h2WPOH9D90 cKxInSlTZuAjIbh8XIqtndiZbdzXQEK3jNQQnRrgOiZEzc4T5Lon/pido19ZB6hK t7ktsEJJnu/hVvcZEALWlcBnK3TK2nmtP03WcNVPJiIdIGKrkQNYZ5PTAVAyrXQz n1esO7dCF1h+tT/IuBq/z2LpPKb7e7le23Nj4PEmoowbr1GSzIka9dpBv0rYFT6T WPYVNh2oP74aEB4U3JNuynqdAPw5+jodI4M7WXrT2LTdA6XnBaCkuz5Dq3x2sgDk xsUQMYvm7q9MGji5kcrcsccL3oYBw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:2PqBYDDMXnmO06oN3uL1ZcwXyDQP9JlOR-AKehoj5zbwfB4WHLwEFw> <xme:2PqBYJeRhR3OvBxNM3sVd7Ks54rIVCNobot410hPPJNjk5ySQhcryb8AOiN_v4NYT dXXWJZ4AghZBg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvdduuddguddtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefuvfhfhffkffgfgggjtgfgsehtke ertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefmvghithhhucfoohhorhgvuceomhhoohhrvgesnhgvthif ohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeehhfeutdehfe fgfefghfekhefguefgieduueegjeekfeelleeuieffteefueduueenucfkphepjeefrddu udefrdduieelrdeiudenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrih hlfhhrohhmpehmohhorhgvsehnvghtfihorhhkqdhhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:2PqBYLecBV1vuDBkg_LDGax8srcpPf59e9eepnG7Ye-b9w-dBbAe8A> <xmx:2PqBYNgQj5KVQzvkZIQ2IzZfT4YFSSw6sZVpMVF8KVyBpohC39JQRA> <xmx:2PqBYHRFK9bnw3mkH9ZGfzpiyvlkdNev8XfYcxnX-zCkGZl2gi0Omg> <xmx:2fqBYCJlziWBmG9p3KFSpfs_XgoAtyk6mAL_YNq3NjxJ9QwvA7eohA>
Received: from [192.168.30.202] (c-73-113-169-61.hsd1.tn.comcast.net [73.113.169.61]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2DB7424005B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 18:38:16 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Stray thoughts on ' Update of IESG statement "Last Call Guidance to the Community"'
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <161859546000.27694.13585496003852397044@ietfa.amsl.com> <6081A148.7070701@btconnect.com> <8279565a-ee50-ab3a-8b97-afc6ca23f4ba@gmail.com> <bf5f53fb-0aad-941d-a683-e7c40165cbac@nostrum.com> <7b9e4b99-7bec-39c3-be92-44482829e41b@network-heretics.com> <20210422223100.GA2544@miplet.aaaaa.org>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Message-ID: <e609169d-9474-f033-4dea-614f349df7eb@network-heretics.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 18:38:15 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20210422223100.GA2544@miplet.aaaaa.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/BmIMFwfOP5SFhAd54bJY7wY2nKc>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 22:38:24 -0000

On 4/22/21 6:31 PM, Ofer Inbar wrote:

> Would adding area and WG tags in an email header to the initial
> announcement to last-call, in a standard format, make it easy enough
> for people to set up something to alert them to the ones they care
> about?

I doubt it, because even among IETF participants I'm not sure how many 
people have access to effective configurable mail filtering (without 
changing email providers), or the inclination to learn how to use it.   
But doing that might be a good first step toward making more powerful 
tools available (and/or toward educating people about how to use the 
tools they already have).

Keith

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email