IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Missing requirement in draft-sparks-genarea-imaparch? (was Re: New Version Notification - draft-sparks-genarea-imaparch-05.txt)

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Wed, 03 April 2013 16:22 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB98121F8ED6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 09:22:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bIQ6S-Knvz9t for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 09:22:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 153A121F8ECA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 09:22:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.66] (76-218-9-215.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.9.215]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r33GMKKW029980 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 3 Apr 2013 09:22:20 -0700
Message-ID: <515C573A.7000109@dcrocker.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:22:18 -0700
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Subject: Re: Missing requirement in draft-sparks-genarea-imaparch? (was Re: New Version Notification - draft-sparks-genarea-imaparch-05.txt)
References: <20130326204553.17292.36013.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5153571C.9070800@nostrum.com> <6E194773-03C8-4A88-8002-C9E4C8657E98@isode.com> <692E7C28-FF9E-4F3A-8369-4CB2836BFB7E@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <692E7C28-FF9E-4F3A-8369-4CB2836BFB7E@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:22:20 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 16:22:21 -0000

On 4/3/2013 9:10 AM, Russ Housley wrote:
> Alexey:
>
> Of course we want to be able to delete spam, but this is being used
> to access an archive, so only the administrator should be able to
> delete the spam.
>
> Russ
>
>
> On Apr 1, 2013, at 1:41 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>
>> On 27 Mar 2013, at 20:31, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
>> wrote:
>>> While looking at it, I noticed we don't explicitly say that this
>>> IMAP interface MUST NOT allow messages in the archive to be
>>> deleted
>>
>> I would actually allow administrative users to delete messages
>> (e.g. spam), but such actions should be recorded in logs. Other
>> users shouldn't be allowed to do that.


I'm  confused Russ.  Isn't that exactly what Alexey recommends, here?

d/

-- 
  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email