Re: Travel/Attendees list FAQ

What is the value in publishing a living document as an RFC (which inherently a static, archival document)?  Wouldn't it make more sense to convert the contents of this document to a Wiki page that we could jointly edit and maintain going forward?

Margaret

On Dec 7, 2011, at 9:27 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote:

> 
> 
> On 12/7/2011 6:09 AM, George, Wes wrote:
>> I'm also open to suggestions as to the appropriate publication track for
>> thisdocument, whether I should look to have it sponsored as a GenArea doc or simply>
>> put it forward as an individual submission.
> 
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-george-travel-faq
> 
> 
> I suggest that this be processed as an individual submission.  It will still get IETF review but I believe it does not require the level of active consensus by a working group (pseudo or otherwise) that a typical technical specification does.
> 
> However I suggest that the document cast itself as a snapshot of an on-going documentation process, with the "master" copy being an IETF Wiki; the document should contain a point to the wiki.
> 
> I'll also suggest that there be an on-going mailing list for discussing meeting logistics issues, rather than a different mailing list for each meeting. (ietf-meeting?)
> 
> The current contents -- a template of information to be developed -- looks quite good.  But it can't be "complete", and the definition of "complete" is likely to change frequently.  That's a perfect candidate for a wiki effort.
> 
> d/
> -- 
> 
>  Dave Crocker
>  Brandenburg InternetWorking
>  bbiw.net
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf