Re: Travel/Attendees list FAQ

On Dec 7, 2011, at 7:11 AM, Margaret Wasserman wrote:

> 
> What is the value in publishing a living document as an RFC (which inherently a static, archival document)?  Wouldn't it make more sense to convert the contents of this document to a Wiki page that we could jointly edit and maintain going forward?

+1

I think it's important that this be dynamic and easy to change.  

Bob

> 
> Margaret
> 
> On Dec 7, 2011, at 9:27 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 12/7/2011 6:09 AM, George, Wes wrote:
>>> I'm also open to suggestions as to the appropriate publication track for
>>> thisdocument, whether I should look to have it sponsored as a GenArea doc or simply>
>>> put it forward as an individual submission.
>> 
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-george-travel-faq
>> 
>> 
>> I suggest that this be processed as an individual submission.  It will still get IETF review but I believe it does not require the level of active consensus by a working group (pseudo or otherwise) that a typical technical specification does.
>> 
>> However I suggest that the document cast itself as a snapshot of an on-going documentation process, with the "master" copy being an IETF Wiki; the document should contain a point to the wiki.
>> 
>> I'll also suggest that there be an on-going mailing list for discussing meeting logistics issues, rather than a different mailing list for each meeting. (ietf-meeting?)
>> 
>> The current contents -- a template of information to be developed -- looks quite good.  But it can't be "complete", and the definition of "complete" is likely to change frequently.  That's a perfect candidate for a wiki effort.
>> 
>> d/
>> -- 
>> 
>> Dave Crocker
>> Brandenburg InternetWorking
>> bbiw.net
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ietf mailing list
>> Ietf@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf