Re: Travel/Attendees list FAQ

Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net> Wed, 07 December 2011 14:28 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0278F21F8B5D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Dec 2011 06:28:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.532
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.532 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.067, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZHz4m9s362d1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Dec 2011 06:28:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32D7021F8B4F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Dec 2011 06:28:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.9] (adsl-67-127-55-53.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [67.127.55.53]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pB7ERvjg002557 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 7 Dec 2011 06:28:03 -0800
Message-ID: <4EDF77EA.5010005@dcrocker.net>
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 06:27:54 -0800
From: Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "George, Wes" <wesley.george@twcable.com>
Subject: Re: Travel/Attendees list FAQ
References: <DCC302FAA9FE5F4BBA4DCAD46569377914531E0B6B@PRVPEXVS03.corp.twcable.com>
In-Reply-To: <DCC302FAA9FE5F4BBA4DCAD46569377914531E0B6B@PRVPEXVS03.corp.twcable.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Wed, 07 Dec 2011 06:28:04 -0800 (PST)
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 14:28:05 -0000

On 12/7/2011 6:09 AM, George, Wes wrote:
> I'm also open to suggestions as to the appropriate publication track for
> thisdocument, whether I should look to have it sponsored as a GenArea doc or simply>
> put it forward as an individual submission.

> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-george-travel-faq


I suggest that this be processed as an individual submission.  It will still get 
IETF review but I believe it does not require the level of active consensus by a 
working group (pseudo or otherwise) that a typical technical specification does.

However I suggest that the document cast itself as a snapshot of an on-going 
documentation process, with the "master" copy being an IETF Wiki; the document 
should contain a point to the wiki.

I'll also suggest that there be an on-going mailing list for discussing meeting 
logistics issues, rather than a different mailing list for each meeting. 
(ietf-meeting?)

The current contents -- a template of information to be developed -- looks quite 
good.  But it can't be "complete", and the definition of "complete" is likely to 
change frequently.  That's a perfect candidate for a wiki effort.

d/
-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net