Re: RFC 20 status change last call: References to appendices

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Sat, 03 January 2015 19:26 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAE7F1A010E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Jan 2015 11:26:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.862
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.862 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hf42ZoI_KSA7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Jan 2015 11:26:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91ED41A0055 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 3 Jan 2015 11:26:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 3750 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2015 19:26:55 -0000
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 3 Jan 2015 19:26:55 -0000
Date: 3 Jan 2015 19:26:33 -0000
Message-ID: <20150103192633.19997.qmail@ary.lan>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: RFC 20 status change last call: References to appendices
In-Reply-To: <20150103180808.19797.qmail@ary.lan>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/FlR5FlVielX0Glrh_p1EVWR7eos
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2015 19:26:57 -0000

In article <20150103180808.19797.qmail@ary.lan> you write:
>>An erratum saying "the text points to appendixes that are actually in
>>the ANSI standard it talks about" should be sufficient.

By the way, I don't have a copy of X3.4-1968, but I do have a copy of
X3.4-1977, which says in the back that it's a minor revision of the
1968 edition.  The two footnotes on page 5 appear unchanged in the
1977 edition, other than that appendix B4 is now B5, and I can assure
you that you haven't missed anything you didn't already know.

R's,
John