Re: RFC 20 status change last call: References to appendices

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Sun, 04 January 2015 01:59 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 821031A1ACE for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Jan 2015 17:59:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.862
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.862 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AqmxGnGDpbp7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Jan 2015 17:59:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 125A81A1ACA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 3 Jan 2015 17:59:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 54392 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2015 01:59:49 -0000
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 4 Jan 2015 01:59:49 -0000
Date: 4 Jan 2015 01:59:27 -0000
Message-ID: <20150104015927.20881.qmail@ary.lan>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: RFC 20 status change last call: References to appendices
In-Reply-To: <8AF05DCA-2BF2-40A6-81A2-F7A27CBAE2F3@umn.edu>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/_jnpXk_Qn3TNNos59zhy2Pc3YIk
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2015 01:59:52 -0000

>> By the way, I don't have a copy of X3.4-1968, but I do have a copy of
>> X3.4-1977, which says in the back that it's a minor revision of the
>> 1968 edition.  The two footnotes on page 5 appear unchanged in the
>> 1977 edition, other than that appendix B4 is now B5, and I can assure
>> you that you haven't missed anything you didn't already know.

>Give that reference copies of x3.4-1968 are few and far between and I don't believe are
>available electronically anywhere other than RFC 20 itself, I would like to suggest a note in
>the erratum translating the appendix pointers to x3.4-1977 and that the current version
>x3.4-1986 contains the differences between it and x3.4-1977.

The current version appears to be ANSI INCITS 4-1986 (R2007).  Copies,
probably all unauthorized, are easy to find on the web.  It's still not
very different from the earlier versions.

Since the appendices in question say nothing of importance, I think we
have spent far too much time on this already.

R's,
John