Re: UN

Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com> Fri, 30 September 2005 13:13 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ELKhH-0008DD-Cq; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 09:13:07 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ELKhC-0008D6-VD for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 09:13:04 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA09881 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 09:12:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mtagate3.uk.ibm.com ([195.212.29.136]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ELKp2-0005J3-FF for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 09:21:09 -0400
Received: from d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.38.185]) by mtagate3.uk.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j8UDD3Hp241686 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 14:13:03 +0100
Received: from d06av04.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av04.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.216]) by d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VERS6.7) with ESMTP id j8UDCkpE189494 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 14:12:46 +0100
Received: from d06av04.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d06av04.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j8UDCjup025918 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 14:12:45 +0100
Received: from sihl.zurich.ibm.com (sihl.zurich.ibm.com [9.4.16.232]) by d06av04.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j8UDCjPY025903 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 14:12:45 +0100
Received: from zurich.ibm.com (sig-9-145-135-131.de.ibm.com [9.145.135.131]) by sihl.zurich.ibm.com (AIX4.3/8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA72352 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 15:12:44 +0200
Message-ID: <433D39C9.7070701@zurich.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 15:12:41 +0200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
Organization: IBM
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
X-Accept-Language: en, fr, de
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0509291724010.20970@raptor> <433C7BAC.80700@peter-dambier.de>
In-Reply-To: <433C7BAC.80700@peter-dambier.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: c0bedb65cce30976f0bf60a0a39edea4
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: UN
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

Hi,

Although what WSIS may or may not decide is undoubtedly of
interest to the Internet community, I really think it is a
distraction here and now until there are concrete questions
for us to discuss. Our community's route to the WSIS discussions
is through the ISOC - where basic membership is free, by the way.

      Brian

Peter Dambier wrote:
> Alexis Turner wrote:
> 
>> I don't want to clutter up everyone's inboxes with dozens of rants that
>> amount to hyperventilating and lots of "IiiiEEEE's!," but if anyone would
>> like to e-mail me off list with their thoughts on the UN's WSIS 
>> conference
>> and why having them replace ICANN would be a good/bad thing for the
>> Internet, I would love to hear it.  I'm not looking to pick a fight or
>> argue - I'm just honestly interested in hearing the various opinions.  
>> The
>> issue is a lot bigger than anything I can get my head around right now,
>> and hearing what other people have to say would help me think about it
>> more constructively.
>>
>> I myself am on this list more or less "Just for kicks," or, as I 
>> prefer to
>> think of it, "personal edification," but do note that it is possible
>> quotes from your e-mails will make it onto a personal site that I use for
>> my own rambling and probably incoherent research.  If you don't want
>> this, just say so.
>> -Alexis
>>
>> PS: Bonus points if you actually read what they are proposing before you
>> respond.
>>
> 
> Hi Alexis,
> 
> I followed the discussion list. I could hardly follow it.
> 
> Is there a UN?
> 
> To me it looks like a bunch of small and not so small dictators at the 
> table
> and several rooms full of intelligent people outside.
> 
> It might be interesting to give them the internet. But how should you do
> that? What could they do with it?
> 
> Give them the root. The root operators will laughingly stand up and go 
> away.
> Each of them will start running his own root on his own hardware.
> 
> The internet hardware? Belongs to companies that were not allowed to join.
> How should all the internet operators find out what "the UN" want them to
> do if they dont allow them in?
> 
> I dont think anything but a lot of wasted paper will come out of that 
> meeting.
> 
> 
> Kind regards,
> Peter and Karin Dambier
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf