Re: UN

kent crispin <kent@songbird.com> Fri, 30 September 2005 05:34 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ELDXe-0007bg-5k; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 01:34:42 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ELDXX-0007YK-5H for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 01:34:39 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA07937 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 01:34:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sb7.songbird.com ([208.184.79.137]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ELDfG-0003JN-P2 for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 01:42:36 -0400
Received: from raven.songbird.com (sb7.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j8U5YqJQ006503 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 22:34:52 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by raven.songbird.com (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j8U5Y6oF023283 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 22:34:06 -0700
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 22:34:06 -0700
From: kent crispin <kent@songbird.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20050930053406.GK15172@raven.songbird.com>
Mail-Followup-To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0509291724010.20970@raptor> <433C7BAC.80700@peter-dambier.de> <p06230949bf6232223289@[165.227.249.220]> <284706962.20050930054024@atkielski.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <284706962.20050930054024@atkielski.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-SongbirdInformation: support@songbird.com for more information
X-Songbird: Found to be clean
X-Songbird-From: kent@raven.songbird.com
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 2409bba43e9c8d580670fda8b695204a
Subject: Re: UN
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 05:40:24AM +0200, Anthony G. Atkielski wrote:
> Paul Hoffman writes:
> 
> > You talk as if you were a root operator and you know what they would
> > do. In fact, you run an alternate root, not a real root, so it seems
> > that you knowing what real root operators would do is particularly 
> > unlikely.
> 
> There really isn't any such thing as a "real root" or "alternate root"
> on the Internet, just as paper currency and coins have no "real
> value."  It all depends on what the majority decides to do.  If
> everyone switches to an "alternate root" tomorrow, then the "real
> root" won't matter.

That's sounds good, but in fact, it's utter nonsense.  It's like saying that
the only difference between rowboat and a cargo ship is what people believe
about them.  In fact, if everybody started using one of the alternate roots,
it would simply collapse. 

There is far more to the real root system than just human sentiment.  There
is heavy duty infrastructure, both human and physical, involved.

-- 
Kent Crispin 
kent@icann.org    p: +1 310 823 9358  f: +1 310 823 8649
kent@songbird.com SIP: 81202@fwd.pulver.com


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf