Re: UN
Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Fri, 30 September 2005 10:26 UTC
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ELI5r-00064y-Fq; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 06:26:19 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ELI5o-00062u-OJ for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 06:26:16 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA02995 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 06:26:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mx2.nic.fr ([192.134.4.11]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ELIDc-0001TW-DF for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 06:34:23 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 671BC26C09C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 12:25:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from maya40.nic.fr (maya40.nic.fr [192.134.4.151]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C4126C084 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 12:25:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from batilda.nic.fr (postfix@batilda.nic.fr [192.134.4.69]) by maya40.nic.fr (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id j8UAPoYa656625 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 12:25:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by batilda.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 170B016A943; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 12:25:50 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 12:25:50 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20050930102550.GA29198@nic.fr>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0509291724010.20970@raptor> <433C7BAC.80700@peter-dambier.de> <p06230949bf6232223289@[165.227.249.220]> <284706962.20050930054024@atkielski.com> <20050930053406.GK15172@raven.songbird.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050930053406.GK15172@raven.songbird.com>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 3.1
X-Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686 i686
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mx2.nic.fr
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d6b246023072368de71562c0ab503126
Subject: Re: UN
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 10:34:06PM -0700, kent crispin <kent@songbird.com> wrote a message of 32 lines which said: > In fact, if everybody started using one of the alternate roots, it > would simply collapse. You're mixing "the network of root servers" with "the root" (Doc/NTIA). The first is a delicate engineering achievment and is not easy to replace. The second one is just a desk with two civil servants. > There is heavy duty infrastructure, both human and physical, > involved. So, I would rephrase Anthony G. Atkielski's thought experiment: If every root name server operator switches to an "alternate root" tomorrow, then the "real root" won't matter. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf