IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: A Splendid Example Of A Renumbering Disaster

Sabahattin Gucukoglu <listsebby@me.com> Mon, 26 November 2012 23:02 UTC

Return-Path: <listsebby@me.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F11521F8711 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:02:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C+9URcxmzAdV for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:02:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nk11p04mm-asmtp004.mac.com (nk11p04mm-asmtpout004.mac.com [17.158.236.239]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2A6921F8594 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:02:25 -0800 (PST)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET="US-ASCII"
Received: from [192.168.1.5] (natbox.sabahattin-gucukoglu.com [213.123.192.30]) by nk11p04mm-asmtp004.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01(7.0.4.24.0) 64bit (built Jan 3 2012)) with ESMTPSA id <0ME4004L7ANX8330@nk11p04mm-asmtp004.mac.com> for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 23:02:25 +0000 (GMT)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.9.8185, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2012-11-26_03:2012-11-26, 2012-11-25, 1970-01-01 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=9 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1203120001 definitions=main-1211260253
Subject: Re: A Splendid Example Of A Renumbering Disaster
From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu <listsebby@me.com>
In-reply-to: <50B3D402.7070502@qti.qualcomm.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 23:02:20 +0000
Message-id: <DE8FD3FC-4C3B-41B7-ADDB-4605D7D87E6F@me.com>
References: <54E43A43-A9F3-4803-BAB9-B06F4EB0CB19@me.com> <50B3D402.7070502@qti.qualcomm.com>
To: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 23:02:26 -0000

On 26 Nov 2012, at 20:41, Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com> wrote:
> On 11/23/12 7:46 PM, Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote:
>> http://b.logme.in/2012/11/07/changes-to-hamachi-on-november-19th/

> Yes, like Benson, I am at a loss for why they do not use RFC 6598 addresses. That's what someone should tell these goofballs to do.

OK, I'm getting the idea.  I've left a comment there.  Hopefully somebody will find it.

Cheers,
Sabahattin

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email