Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-behave-lsn-requirements-07

Alexey Melnikov <> Tue, 03 July 2012 12:24 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12B3D21F8773; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 05:24:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.928
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.928 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.329, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7batqi-v3dW0; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 05:24:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C3E821F8753; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 05:24:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1341318279;; s=selector;; bh=gS2QKhb3YGUATdJ2yNj75vPECrB1nwsm73yUzjZJvi8=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=FcxZWFT+vQNdjhIHWG67iVnm1eA7+QoYF3k/Tx6nYcdqNxShb11a/s4FzWbJtEeqjaUs1W jv385ww65UzpXmCSe6ghMUxWr329pgoviz2hreclYSGqwProcLSpa++Fb7qZOhJBewv+ss zslsIsFxFcMHyCWG6NYlsM8HXTLKN5g=;
Received: from [] ( []) by (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id <>; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 13:24:38 +0100
X-SMTP-Protocol-Errors: PIPELINING
Message-ID: <>
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 13:24:28 +0100
From: Alexey Melnikov <>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
Subject: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-behave-lsn-requirements-07
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 12:24:34 -0000

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments 
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-behave-lsn-requirements-07
Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov
Review Date: 3-July-2012
IETF LC End Date: 10-July-2012
IESG Telechat date: Pending

Summary: The document is ready for publication as a BCP.

Major Issues: None

Minor Issues: None

Nits/editorial comments:

I found it is to be odd to have a requirements document as a BCP, but I 
am sure
you can sort the right status out with IESG.

I found the justification for REQ-6 hard to read/understand. Why does 
access to
servers being on the internal network need to go through CGN at all?


Justification:  It is anticipated that CGNs will be primarily
       deployed in ISP networks where the need for management is
       critical.  This requirement is at the SHOULD level to acocunt for

typo: account

       the fact that some CGN operators may not need management

Oh really :-)? (Sorry, couldn't resist.)