IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Make an all-virtual IETF meeting a 24 hour affair

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 02 March 2020 22:36 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28A773A09A0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 14:36:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GdQb1VWKy_l5 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 14:36:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1036.google.com (mail-pj1-x1036.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1036]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D66753A09A6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 14:36:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1036.google.com with SMTP id f2so370897pjq.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 14:36:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=UaaQ0Yw5DSWKcuVMFOg6HQdltI5ZaUIM1RLWRRRh0d0=; b=jgMQBSHBNCY/u/5Y8M7q0LMMT6rAPdBfNDYhIlL/Tizgdc7HbPj7BQ3BZshC3MFpB0 LrYtLBVtg1RmLhM4YBJBbsFTpwycqMojCVFwas++fe09O6fT7qk3++pdHMC6YXu54mf8 cBjUTgdCMfwYvzgNR2YYEORKCWuXAo7PN/K28NYXsPF+iRjSuLr/Q/wDBkcZ1AVSTvet ETRwOvKX6IY+v/2yRIYvkv+NHKSIPZ13AhjrbwI0i+KczxSU3uyDT6Pc6uQ8tLA+JfBL e+t9ETaTzZRC1g/AoPKE5JesNfr4YheFy9eaoJrRpIBy9zUQYtLt/Ga89gXF/7F4WeZt mc4A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=UaaQ0Yw5DSWKcuVMFOg6HQdltI5ZaUIM1RLWRRRh0d0=; b=FHYBN6xdUE3PXDvn4sDXg5ZCiXETtgRQc8qvvcRZ5mv9orzEtO1iT/EJNBhuop9KCI lBxEJIeUNIqOel/UqpTh8i+oLuid36AtBH+WX18Zsn/TXbhPE8HD0fUhDKmzoAI1YeMj 9II9SnheR7FLjUY8juw0T49fzLsOkF7j4C0rj8S1i6mtv7x4Rh42G3zPZZrJmcFJ8ILX kIOcbbTcjPj/meE23EnhkhIUD2aaYb4icNQWR3PhJ05bkAs5p9UnCQABMh1x65r9joCT pMMjkxQpI8qgLumxj84+u+qCMFlCc0nS3iWypg+sSl6wRM1rRMu8P1q1qbhp8V2qh4A6 fuWw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ0Z6+mi4sERvGvLcuEbiQbh17RQ03ZRx/sHyRa07sSwGX2T+lcG u1EVKaaXXNP5c28lNArxCzc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vs8sRbYpDiDqMZqXiv/vQmIK1tMVl6XVV2vItyqaZZ62Vkhc7p0sL1udoEZVWOy8ELLpWzAuA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:c394:: with SMTP id g20mr1289018plg.232.1583188591157; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 14:36:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:8802:5900:13c4::100e? ([2600:8802:5900:13c4::100e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b64sm3726108pfa.94.2020.03.02.14.36.29 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 02 Mar 2020 14:36:30 -0800 (PST)
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <25471393-89DC-4BFA-AFBE-E47DA3D56B2C@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_29FABF47-0664-42D1-B399-2B25095FC61D"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23\))
Subject: Re: Make an all-virtual IETF meeting a 24 hour affair
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2020 14:36:28 -0800
In-Reply-To: <CAObGJnObKuT1PjAzRQAqxzxNrz83SSFC0QqHPOSeLBKkz-TUYg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola=40open-xchange.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
To: Thomas Fossati <tho.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <CAA=duU1xu0aGY--B281SjQzJZmk_nYmZZh9bcqZPeGegxFNUVA@mail.gmail.com> <1640175469.18280.1582813905817@appsuite-gw1.open-xchange.com> <CAObGJnObKuT1PjAzRQAqxzxNrz83SSFC0QqHPOSeLBKkz-TUYg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/HtzDiflz-J_XGLA7XUA1fdLxU_U>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2020 22:36:34 -0000


> On Feb 27, 2020, at 6:57 AM, Thomas Fossati <tho.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 2:32 PM Vittorio Bertola
> <vittorio.bertola=40open-xchange.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>> Il 27/02/2020 14:06 Andrew G. Malis <agmalis@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>> But people that have to attend multiple WGs that meet on the same day would potentially have to stay up for 24 hours, if each of those WGs chose a different timezone. I think this would be even worse, and it would make it hard to pop into WGs that you do not normally follow, which is one of the added values of IETF meetings.
> 
> Just a thought: in a fully virtual scenario there is no need to keep
> all the meetings within the current 4.5 days wide slot.

True, but only works if participants only participate in IETF. For me, that would be a non-starter.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email