IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IAB agendas now public

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Thu, 06 September 2018 04:04 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9F89130E59 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 21:04:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2bIM-dTWcYD9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 21:04:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34866124C04 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 21:04:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5011; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1536206654; x=1537416254; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=C6IO8jyu2ZiOF5gZFvFxIFce2mIQzaaEY0bkMskzdEA=; b=J/8lkPMqwtcLLskmgBCaPfx6eJuYm1usHxCTZvMPP7CPWy/iyf/F8HyR 0Fdjozd0F5T4BTJ3amQFQbDMuDmpDPlF8IeOQ3nGmZxmXhTrEof0BEbeZ fJPhCdpK2uKA2LZ8BO1t7fQq1/aKESF7SeTSGyYYQ/xUJew7gD73ugYjz U=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 488
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CRAQADp5Bb/5hdJa1ZGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYNOgWSEGpYjLZB8hy0IA4RsAoNQITgUAQIBAQIBAQJtKIU4AQUjVhALBA4GKgICSQ4GAQwIAQEQgw0BggGiE4EuH4lYD4Jsh20XggCBEieCa4RXgyiCVwKOJI06CYN6gWGKHAYXiFKGEJN1gVghgVUzGggbFYMokFEhH4tggksBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.53,334,1531785600"; d="asc'?scan'208,217";a="230349586"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Sep 2018 04:04:13 +0000
Received: from [10.24.114.111] ([10.24.114.111]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w8644CWM029057; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 04:04:12 GMT
Subject: Re: IAB agendas now public
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>, IAB Chair <iab-chair@iab.org>
References: <b4afddcc-e8dc-9bd8-03d3-6374c29c4749@iab.org> <m2a7ownhl0.wl-randy@psg.com> <BC35696A-D4A6-47EA-A85C-EB472E42596E@lucidvision.com> <CA+9kkMCGNpFQGwEYZzn3CcOAdz_-GGMCP-N4jX_YuJ8tri0Bxw@mail.gmail.com> <fffabcb8-ee6f-d90b-f661-9011088b892b@gmail.com> <m2a7ovmzgk.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Autocrypt: addr=lear@cisco.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= xsBNBFMe1UQBCADdYOS5APDpIpF2ohAxB+nxg1GpAYr8iKwGIb86Wp9NkK5+QwbW9H035clT lpVLciExtN8E3MCTPOIm7aITPlruixAVwlBY3g7U9eRppSw9O2H/7bie2GOnYxqmsw4v1yNZ 9NcMLlD8raY0UcQ5r698c8JD4xUTLqybZXaK2sPeJkxzT+IwupRSQ+vXEvFFGhERQ88zo5Ca Sa1Gw/Rv54oH0Dq2XYkO41rhxQ60BKZLZuQK1d9+1y3I+An3AJeD3AA31fJZD3H8YRKOBgqe ILPILbw1mM7gCtCjfvFCt6AFCwEsjITGx55ceoQ+t5B5XGYJEppMWsIFrwZsfbL+gP31ABEB AAHNJUVsaW90IExlYXIgPGxlYXJAb2Zjb3Vyc2VpbXJpZ2h0LmNvbT7CwJEEEwECADsCGwMC HgECF4ACGQEWIQSY0L2QRh2wkqeyYR2HtmtG2dJ6MwUCWxJwMwULCQgHAgYVCAkKCwIEFgID AQAKCRCHtmtG2dJ6MyMyCACXvtFjAYGMtOkD9MD4nI3ifFpkrj8xTMbXjrv5hdqmzRmQ0wqA 1U/OlZux+P/NaVMiZNZc8zw0nsx/INAqDOVd4/tLWF+ywTkeRFR0VnaUxLwCReZAZOaRS+md +52u/6ddoFja2RnjZ43qbbuvVUARQVIyMJz+GbR6mEZQHR0psD7dDYZDyrpivCxm8zHQwmB6 AZUlO7OJgljDvVPVDCabg/ZnJw1qS0OzSiNb0MySk1D5A7FdwDgeKxuMYUOOoVVTTMWNWcME UkRX9LxElswEt0PQWiz/j3FYXTxiFfl/1vKcHx4pM+E5C5mhTbrdFUFLJC3Y5fLID7stK/Ch aEaBzsBNBFMe1UQBCAC0WV7Ydbv95xYGPhthTdChBIpPtl7JPCV/c6/3iEmvjpfGuFNaK4Ma cj9le20EA5A1BH7PgLGoHOiPM65NysRpZ96RRVX3TNfLmhGMFr5hPOGNdq+xcGHVutmwPV9U 7bKeUNRiPFx3YdEkExddqV2E8FltT0x2FSKe2xszPPHB6gVtMckX5buI9p1K3fbVhXdvEkcY Y/jB0JEJGyhS5aEbct5cHUvDAkT81/YFK5Jfg8RRwu1q1t1YuIJSOWAZQ9J9oUsg6D9RpClU +tIFBoe3iTp1AUfJcypucGKgLYKtpu/aygcpQONHYkYW5003mPsrajFhReVF5veycMbHs4u5 ABEBAAHCwF8EGAECAAkFAlMe1UQCGwwACgkQh7ZrRtnSejOSuQgA27p2rYB7Kh20dym6V8c6 2pWpBHHTgxr/32zevxHSiXl6xvUCg5T8WUwfUk8OvgDcBErK/blDAMXQzSg3sp450JhR8RnX HXF5Zz2T04X7HnlIVJGwf2CjnwyEAJCqMzaCmI+g3Imvg/8L4nyBFvhlFHDv+kIvMiujyycj PAu7xxKplBs1/IEwmDoAMjneFmawvfeQnwdMhSKK8PjKSuzGU5uUmxj3GBfRqvTM0qpmhMPF OmDhJSmH55HLAky2MlmqJYXJPt/9EfSEhFiua1M6gLiuNEuPkp+8jcnHQqKr0IeHt8UqcwLt 2mGfIyl0FVdF9hvWPjNRzGbgqoT1Di03RQ==
Message-ID: <ff7314d6-15f9-e307-6ec7-e3ffd99ee1bd@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2018 21:04:11 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <m2a7ovmzgk.wl-randy@psg.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="suBjNrSbIUlFIqPllAbowoSfQdQev4Cky"
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.24.114.111, [10.24.114.111]
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-1.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Icb3rwmsVXe73_GvcdtskedGbGw>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2018 04:04:16 -0000

On my time on the board, there were very few "pens down" moments, but
there were a few:

  * Appointments/NOMCOM confirmations
  * Organizational disputes involving intelligence that would not have
    been shared in an open forum.

The IAB was very effective addressing both of these with some limited
use of executive session.

Eliot


On 05.09.18 14:00, Randy Bush wrote:
>> But there are quite a lot of issues the IAB has to handle that are not
>> part of its architecture remit and that do have a political
>> angle. Replay the great ICANN/IANA saga a couple of years ago, for
>> example. I fear that either the IAB would have been very inhibited in
>> its discussions, or they would mainly have been held in executive
>> sessions.
> i beg to differ.  heck, forget the begging :)
>
> when it is a personnel or analogous issue, sure
>
> but when it affects our community, it should be open.  and 'politics'
> affects our community.  the icann/iana saga should have been open.
> the ietf prides itself on being open.  well, we should walk the walk.
>
> btw, politics is what happens when more than one person is involved.
>
> randy
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email